<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amanda Peet Aplogizes&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2008/07/amanda-peet-aplogizes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2008/07/amanda-peet-aplogizes/</link>
	<description>Autism news and opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:29:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2008/07/amanda-peet-aplogizes/#comment-52368</link>
		<dc:creator>Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=969#comment-52368</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;1. I’ve read McCarthy’s book and she is far from the anti-vaccine crusader that the media seems to paint her as. Indeed, she only mentioned vaccines once and all she says – after reminding the reader that she isn’t a doctor, just a concerened parent (hmmm.. sound familiar Miss Peet?) – is that she thinks there enough evidence of a link to warrant further investigation and to reccomend a book about the controversy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

is there a reason why you have left out everything that Ms. McCarthy has done since writing her book?  I&#039;d love to hear from more people who have no idea that she was on Larry King Live, that she organized a vaccine-rally in DC, that she supports the very questionable Generation Rescue &quot;alternative&quot; vaccine schedule that leaves out Measles, Mumps and Rubella entirely.

&lt;blockquote&gt;2. Peet has been going out of her way to say that she isn’t an expert, that people shouldn’t be listening to her. Me thinks the lady doth protest too much – because if she really felt her opinion wasn’t worth listening to, she wouldn’t be taking a spokesperson job with Every Child By Two.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

She notes that her opinion isn&#039;t important, but the fact that her celebrity brings attention is.  Let&#039;s face it, had Every Child By Two held a press conference without her, would anyone have come?  

That is her value-add and she is acknowledging it and honestly stating her limitations.

&lt;blockquote&gt;3. Dr. Paul Offit – the only doctor Peet consulted with outside of her own extended family – has a questionable background to say the least. Even taking care to avoid potentially biased autism activism websites, I found several articles – including one by Lou Dobbs – about how he abuses his authority with the CDC to make a vaccine he held the patent on mandatory ( http://thedobbsfraudreport.blo.....gspot.com/ )and how said vaccine was recalled almost immediately for causing more problems than it treated (http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/ac/05/slides/5-4198S1_2.ppt).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Are you aware of the actual facts, or did you make these mistakes honestly?

Dr. Offit did not vote on his own vaccine when he was on the vaccine advisory panel.  He voted on a competitor&#039;s vaccine.  His votes were in accord with his potential conflicts of interest.

Note that the vaccine that was recalled was not the one that Dr. Offit assisted in creating.  The one that was recalled was RotaShield.  Dr. Offit&#039;s vaccine, which came out later, was RotaTeq.  Mixing those two vaccines up is a common mistake.  Sometimes the mistake is an honest one, sometimes it isn&#039;t.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Seems to me that Peet isn’t nearly as educated as she would like to think.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A tough statement to make given the clear mistakes you have made in your own post.

Has Amanda Peet mentioned in any of this her degree from Columbia?  I haven&#039;t heard it. 

Makes an interesting comparison to having a Gh.D. (Doctorate of Ghoogle)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<blockquote>1. I&#8217;ve read McCarthy&#8217;s book and she is far from the anti-vaccine crusader that the media seems to paint her as. Indeed, she only mentioned vaccines once and all she says &#8211; after reminding the reader that she isn&#8217;t a doctor, just a concerened parent (hmmm.. sound familiar Miss Peet?) &#8211; is that she thinks there enough evidence of a link to warrant further investigation and to reccomend a book about the controversy.</p></blockquote>
<p>is there a reason why you have left out everything that Ms. McCarthy has done since writing her book?  I&#8217;d love to hear from more people who have no idea that she was on Larry King Live, that she organized a vaccine-rally in DC, that she supports the very questionable Generation Rescue &#8220;alternative&#8221; vaccine schedule that leaves out Measles, Mumps and Rubella entirely.</p>
<p>
<blockquote>2. Peet has been going out of her way to say that she isn&#8217;t an expert, that people shouldn&#8217;t be listening to her. Me thinks the lady doth protest too much &#8211; because if she really felt her opinion wasn&#8217;t worth listening to, she wouldn&#8217;t be taking a spokesperson job with Every Child By Two.</p></blockquote>
<p>She notes that her opinion isn&#8217;t important, but the fact that her celebrity brings attention is.  Let&#8217;s face it, had Every Child By Two held a press conference without her, would anyone have come?</p>
<p>That is her value-add and she is acknowledging it and honestly stating her limitations.</p>
<p>
<blockquote>3. Dr. Paul Offit &#8211; the only doctor Peet consulted with outside of her own extended family &#8211; has a questionable background to say the least. Even taking care to avoid potentially biased autism activism websites, I found several articles &#8211; including one by Lou Dobbs &#8211; about how he abuses his authority with the <span class="caps">CDC</span> to make a vaccine he held the patent on mandatory ( <a href="http://thedobbsfraudreport.blo&#8230;..gspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://thedobbsfraudreport.blo&#8230;..gspot.com/</a> )and how said vaccine was recalled almost immediately for causing more problems than it treated (<a href="http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/ac/05/slides/5-4198S1_2.ppt" rel="nofollow">http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKE.....98S1_2.ppt</a>).</p></blockquote>
<p>Are you aware of the actual facts, or did you make these mistakes honestly?</p>
<p>Dr. Offit did not vote on his own vaccine when he was on the vaccine advisory panel.  He voted on a competitor&#8217;s vaccine.  His votes were in accord with his potential conflicts of interest.</p>
<p>Note that the vaccine that was recalled was not the one that Dr. Offit assisted in creating.  The one that was recalled was RotaShield.  Dr. Offit&#8217;s vaccine, which came out later, was RotaTeq.  Mixing those two vaccines up is a common mistake.  Sometimes the mistake is an honest one, sometimes it isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>
<blockquote>Seems to me that Peet isn&#8217;t nearly as educated as she would like to think.</p></blockquote>
<p>A tough statement to make given the clear mistakes you have made in your own post.</p>
<p>Has Amanda Peet mentioned in any of this her degree from Columbia?  I haven&#8217;t heard it.</p>
<p>Makes an interesting comparison to having a Gh.D. (Doctorate of Ghoogle)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HCN</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2008/07/amanda-peet-aplogizes/#comment-52363</link>
		<dc:creator>HCN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 19:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=969#comment-52363</guid>
		<description>Lou Dobbs?  Hasn&#039;t there been some controversy over his credibility lately? Especially since the vaccine that was recalled was not the one that Offit was part in developing.  And blaming all sorts of things on immigrants without any facts:
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/2007/05/the_madness_of_1.html

Please, when it comes to medical advice ignore Amanda Peet, Jenny McCarthy, Lou Dobbs and anyone else who has never attended are real School of Medicine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lou Dobbs?  Hasn&#8217;t there been some controversy over his credibility lately? Especially since the vaccine that was recalled was not the one that Offit was part in developing.  And blaming all sorts of things on immigrants without any facts:<br />
<a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/2007/05/the_madness_of_1.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/ne....._of_1.html</a></p>
<p>Please, when it comes to medical advice ignore Amanda Peet, Jenny McCarthy, Lou Dobbs and anyone else who has never attended are real School of Medicine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Morrison</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2008/07/amanda-peet-aplogizes/#comment-52360</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=969#comment-52360</guid>
		<description>Granting that neither McCarthy or Peet is a qualified professional, I am more likely to give McCarthy the benefit of the doubt for three reasons.

1. I&#039;ve read McCarthy&#039;s book and she is far from the anti-vaccine crusader that the media seems to paint her as.  Indeed, she only mentioned vaccines once and all she says - after reminding the reader that she isn&#039;t a doctor, just a concerened parent (hmmm.. sound familiar Miss Peet?) - is that she thinks there enough evidence of a link to warrant further investigation and to reccomend a book about the controversy.
2. Peet has been going out of her way to say that she isn&#039;t an expert, that people shouldn&#039;t be listening to her.  Me thinks the lady doth protest too much - because if she really felt her opinion wasn&#039;t worth listening to, she wouldn&#039;t be taking a spokesperson job with Every Child By Two.
3. Dr. Paul Offit - the only doctor Peet consulted with outside of her own extended family - has a questionable background to say the least.  Even taking care to avoid potentially biased autism activism websites, I found several articles - including one by Lou Dobbs - about how he abuses his authority with the CDC to make a vaccine he held the patent on mandatory ( http://thedobbsfraudreport.blogspot.com/ )and how said vaccine was recalled almost immediately for causing more problems than it treated (http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/ac/05/slides/5-4198S1_2.ppt).

Seems to me that Peet isn&#039;t nearly as educated as she would like to think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granting that neither McCarthy or Peet is a qualified professional, I am more likely to give McCarthy the benefit of the doubt for three reasons.</p>
<p>1. I&#8217;ve read McCarthy&#8217;s book and she is far from the anti-vaccine crusader that the media seems to paint her as.  Indeed, she only mentioned vaccines once and all she says &#8211; after reminding the reader that she isn&#8217;t a doctor, just a concerened parent (hmmm.. sound familiar Miss Peet?) &#8211; is that she thinks there enough evidence of a link to warrant further investigation and to reccomend a book about the controversy.<br />
2. Peet has been going out of her way to say that she isn&#8217;t an expert, that people shouldn&#8217;t be listening to her.  Me thinks the lady doth protest too much &#8211; because if she really felt her opinion wasn&#8217;t worth listening to, she wouldn&#8217;t be taking a spokesperson job with Every Child By Two.<br />
3. Dr. Paul Offit &#8211; the only doctor Peet consulted with outside of her own extended family &#8211; has a questionable background to say the least.  Even taking care to avoid potentially biased autism activism websites, I found several articles &#8211; including one by Lou Dobbs &#8211; about how he abuses his authority with the <span class="caps">CDC</span> to make a vaccine he held the patent on mandatory ( <a href="http://thedobbsfraudreport.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://thedobbsfraudreport.blogspot.com/</a> )and how said vaccine was recalled almost immediately for causing more problems than it treated (<a href="http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/ac/05/slides/5-4198S1_2.ppt" rel="nofollow">http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKE.....98S1_2.ppt</a>).</p>
<p>Seems to me that Peet isn&#8217;t nearly as educated as she would like to think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navi</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2008/07/amanda-peet-aplogizes/#comment-52005</link>
		<dc:creator>navi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=969#comment-52005</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d just read the blog Isn&#039;t she talking yet for an idea of the kinds of kids that are protected by herd immunity and the idea that parents of otherwise healthy children who refuse to vaccinate based solely on fear and not any other reason maybe are parasites. No, my healthy, vaccinated kids probably won&#039;t be hurt, but kids with conditions that affect not just their development, but also their health, can be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d just read the blog Isn&#8217;t she talking yet for an idea of the kinds of kids that are protected by herd immunity and the idea that parents of otherwise healthy children who refuse to vaccinate based solely on fear and not any other reason maybe are parasites. No, my healthy, vaccinated kids probably won&#8217;t be hurt, but kids with conditions that affect not just their development, but also their health, can be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2008/07/amanda-peet-aplogizes/#comment-51999</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=969#comment-51999</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry that she felt the need to apologize- I&#039;ve heard too many anti-vaccinationist parents declare that their kids will be fine because of herd immunity.  To me that does make them parasites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry that she felt the need to apologize- I&#8217;ve heard too many anti-vaccinationist parents declare that their kids will be fine because of herd immunity.  To me that does make them parasites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2008/07/amanda-peet-aplogizes/#comment-51991</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=969#comment-51991</guid>
		<description>Well, personally, I don&#039;t know why she felt the need to apologise. I thought it was a perfectly justified descriptive term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, personally, I don&#8217;t know why she felt the need to apologise. I thought it was a perfectly justified descriptive term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Autism Blog - Cookie Mag talks to the expert (not plural) &#124; Left Brain/Right Brain</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2008/07/amanda-peet-aplogizes/#comment-51985</link>
		<dc:creator>Autism Blog - Cookie Mag talks to the expert (not plural) &#124; Left Brain/Right Brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=969#comment-51985</guid>
		<description>[...] story short, after statements, an apology (but not backpedaling!), lots of internet discussion, a threat here and there, Cookie Magazine now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] story short, after statements, an apology (but not backpedaling!), lots of internet discussion, a threat here and there, Cookie Magazine now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Peet, my new favorite celebrity! &#171; Virginia Hughes</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2008/07/amanda-peet-aplogizes/#comment-51983</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Peet, my new favorite celebrity! &#171; Virginia Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=969#comment-51983</guid>
		<description>[...] (Hat tip: Sullivan) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Hat tip:&#160;Sullivan) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
