Comments on: Wakefield

By: Kev

Kev — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:45:50 +0000

Nothing to do with safe John, but very much to do with being booooored with your inability to parse English.

Guys, look. The game is up. Wakefield’s science is shit and established by both science and now a US court that has examined said science to be shit. Its also now been shown that St Andy altered his results somewhat to make sure they reflected his desires.

What exactly are you defending him for? Or is it that you cannot stand to be exposed for dupes? There’s no shame in that. He screwed you lot over most of all.

And having engineered the last word, thread closed :)

By: Isabella Thomas

Isabella Thomas — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:51:05 +0000

In what way are you using the “La, la, la”,
I do recall Brian Deer saying in the Times article that is what children with special needs do.

By: One Queer Fish

One Queer Fish — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:53:45 +0000

its very simple the questions posted by the self worshipers on here have been answered by us the non self worshipers .Links for instance to Dr Wakefield’s comments have been posted, what could be a better answer but a direct, direction, directly to Dr Wakefield’s response refuting Mr Deer’s “false rumours”. Obviously not the response expected hence your disappointment. on here

I came across this forum and was intrigued by the various comments and not least the Judge Eady letters. So far as I can see, quite simply if Mr Deer had published his Judge Eady letters the rumours circulated just now ,and gathering Kudos rapidly concerning why Mr Deer wont release the Judge Eady Letters Of Complaint would have knocked 80% of them on the head. Simply one cannot afford to ignore such serious allegations such as the Spectator ,et-al of why non publishing of The Judge Eady letters, but as the rumours rumble on un challenged they gather speed and Kudos similar to the content of Mr Deer’s articles , rumours backed with no scientific evidence except his own expert opinion ..well then that’s ok then? Needless to say not one self worshiper asking Mr Deer for the evidence to back up rumours of clinical falsity. not that im surprised but would just thought I would also ask a pointless question to match the other pointless questions asked of us and in whole answered. .shame about the Judge Eady letters?

By: Chris

Chris — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:24:25 +0000

Yes, close the comments. These people are very silly.

By: John Stone

John Stone — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:29:26 +0000

“I was hoping you’d say that. Those three are just sticking their fingers in their ears and saying, “La, la, la”, and you can’t talk any sense into them. Anti-vaxers are impervious to logic.”

Clay, I wonder who is actually doing that – I have answered a lot of points even if people don’t like the answers. Please note that the so-called ant-vaxxers did vaccinate their children. This is just ad hominem junk.

By: Clay

Clay — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:15:58 +0000

“Unless there’s any great reason for keeping this alive I think I’m going to shut it down.”

I was hoping you’d say that. Those three are just sticking their fingers in their ears and saying, “La, la, la”, and you can’t talk any sense into them. Anti-vaxers are impervious to logic.

By: John Stone

John Stone — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 06:41:59 +0000

Kev

Not being sure where the thread is going is, of course, and excellent reason for shutting it down. By far the safest thing, I would say.

By: John Stone

John Stone — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 06:34:33 +0000

Sullivan

Goodness, I make a telling point about about Deer’s one sentence quote from the entire GMC hearing (Susan Davies) and I am being distracting – but it was you who raised it in the first place. Now, that is being distracting!

By: Yellowriver

Yellowriver — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 05:28:04 +0000

Run along there Kev then with your tail between your legs like the good sheep that you are. Only joking about the tail.

By: Kev

Kev — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 05:23:26 +0000

I’m not sure where this thread is going. Fishy, Stone and Thomas can do nothing to answer any question on the meat of Brian’s reports simply falling back on saying ‘he shouldn’t have said them’ over and over again. And we go round and round and round.

Unless there’s any great reason for keeping this alive I think I’m going to shut it down.