Recovery from autism

11 May

At IMFAR, a new abstract is available about recovering from autism. Its also covered by AP in a slightly oblique way. For example, the AP story states:

…at least 10 percent of children with autism can “recover” from it — most of them after undergoing years of intensive behavioral therapy…

And yet I can’t see ABA mentioned in the abstract. Of course, it may be mentioned in the whole paper but its an odd assumption for AP to make.

The other weird thing is the quote from Geraldine Dawson of Autism Speaks:

Autism researcher Geraldine Dawson, chief science officer of the advocacy group Autism Speaks, called Fein’s research a breakthrough.

How so? Its pretty much a replication of work done in December 2008 by Dr Molly Helt. I mean OK it narrows the recovery band from between 10 to 20% of kids from Helt’s figures of 3 – 25% but that hardly makes it a breakthrough. Just a refinement.

Interesting comments abound all over the web. One of the leaders of a large autism/vaccine group says:

Every parent I know who practices biomed treatment also uses some form of educational intervention, whether it is ABA, Floortime, SonRise, etc…

Now lets compare that statement to Helt’s work:

The recovered children studied by us and others, and described above, however, have generally not received any biomedical intervention.

and in a further clarification in an email to me:

Complete medical histories were taken, including vaccination status, and had it turned out that our optimal outcome sample hadn’t been vaccinated or had by and large received chelation, we certainly would have reported that

So if every parent this autism/vaccine leader knows practices educational intervention and the claim is that these kids recover…but Helt’s team found no evidence that biomedical treatment exists in recovered kids, I think that tells its own story.

About these ads

6 Responses to “Recovery from autism”

  1. Joseph May 11, 2009 at 21:47 #

    My reaction when I first saw this was similar: Hasn’t 10% always been the “recovery” rate, roughly?

    I guess it depends on how “recovery” is defined. Also, this was by age 9, but when was intake? Age 2? That’s important to know, as the stability of the diagnosis is not the same across age ranges.

    Szatmari et al. (1989) reports the best “recovery” rates from a long-term outcome study that I know of: 25%. Of course, these were autistics with an IQ of 68 or higher.

  2. thejypsy May 11, 2009 at 22:00 #

    Michelle Dawson’s comments

  3. thejypsy May 12, 2009 at 12:01 #

    Are we not allowed to post links? My comment yesterday, a link to Michelle’s comment on her TMoB board, (since she had great difficulty trying to register her to comment herself) never appeared here.

  4. Kev May 12, 2009 at 17:02 #

    Hi jypsy, I’m really sorry but I can’t see any comment from you awaiting approval or in the spam queue. Posting links should be fine as long as there’s not more than 2 in the comment.

    I’m sorry Michelle is having issues too. The help page might help her.

  5. Sullivan May 12, 2009 at 21:51 #

    Kev, Jipsy–

    The first post is the one Jipsy mentioned–I popped it loose from the spam queue.

  6. Sullivan May 13, 2009 at 05:45 #

    Michelle’sinput is much appreciated. If she wants help registering, she can let me know. I don’t want to respond to her comments here until she can carry on her side of the discussion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,132 other followers

%d bloggers like this: