<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Autism rate of 1 percent, and the embargo that wasn&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2009/10/autism-rate-of-1-percent-and-the-embargo-that-wasnt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2009/10/autism-rate-of-1-percent-and-the-embargo-that-wasnt/</link>
	<description>Autism news and opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 04:28:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2009/10/autism-rate-of-1-percent-and-the-embargo-that-wasnt/#comment-66259</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=3288#comment-66259</guid>
		<description>Not sure if the embargo system is working because I don&#039;t think any of the media coverage on this was very informative. See a recap of news coverage here: http://www.newsy.com/videos/autism_on_the_rise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if the embargo system is working because I don&#8217;t think any of the media coverage on this was very informative. See a recap of news coverage here: <a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/autism_on_the_rise" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsy.com/videos/autism_on_the_rise</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2009/10/autism-rate-of-1-percent-and-the-embargo-that-wasnt/#comment-66166</link>
		<dc:creator>Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=3288#comment-66166</guid>
		<description>bensmymom-


the point is that whoever told Lee Grossman about these studies blew it.  That&#039;s why I started and ended the post with that information.

Whoever did that broke the embargo. Personally, I think someone like Lee Grossman should be able to get advanced notice.  Taking that information public, and especially giving it to a PR man with a history of misrepresenting facts (David Kirby) was poor judgment on the part of Lee Grossman.

I see Lisa Jo as making a small mistake, caused by the confusing situation.  I don&#039;t really fault her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bensmymom-</p>
<p>the point is that whoever told Lee Grossman about these studies blew it.  That&#8217;s why I started and ended the post with that information.</p>
<p>Whoever did that broke the embargo. Personally, I think someone like Lee Grossman should be able to get advanced notice.  Taking that information public, and especially giving it to a PR man with a history of misrepresenting facts (David Kirby) was poor judgment on the part of Lee Grossman.</p>
<p>I see Lisa Jo as making a small mistake, caused by the confusing situation.  I don&#8217;t really fault her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bensmyson</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2009/10/autism-rate-of-1-percent-and-the-embargo-that-wasnt/#comment-66137</link>
		<dc:creator>bensmyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=3288#comment-66137</guid>
		<description>So maybe I missed the point about the embargo, mainstream media is upset that a blogger &quot;broke&quot; the story to a couple of thousand people? Is that why nothing was really reported about it? Is mainstream media really upset? Seriously? 

Our local paper ran an AP wire story buried on page 4. Headline, &quot;Parents report that one on 91 children have autism&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So maybe I missed the point about the embargo, mainstream media is upset that a blogger &#8220;broke&#8221; the story to a couple of thousand people? Is that why nothing was really reported about it? Is mainstream media really upset? Seriously?</p>
<p>Our local paper ran an AP wire story buried on page 4. Headline, &#8220;Parents report that one on 91 children have autism&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina Cruz</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2009/10/autism-rate-of-1-percent-and-the-embargo-that-wasnt/#comment-66131</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina Cruz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=3288#comment-66131</guid>
		<description>On Sept. 26, I wrote an article as LA Special Needs Kids Examiner regarding the increase in autism 1 to 100. While I first read the information in Kirby&#039;s article, quoting Grossman, I also read it at Adventures in Autism as well.  I wanted to write a story about it, and therefore, needed to do the research to verify it.

My search led me to the CDC website, where I found information that had been changed to read, &quot;1 to 300 to 1 in 100 with an average of 1 in 150&quot; quoted for rates of autism.  Since I was very familiar with the old numbers, 1 in 150, I believed this was news. I also found a cached page that showed that the CDC had changed the numbers without informing the public, and I wrote an article about it.  At that point, I was not aware of an embargo.  I simply saw news that needed to be reported, and mainstream journalism had dropped the ball.

I don&#039;t know the motivation for the embargo, but it seems there was other, more important news on Friday afternoon that outlets believed needed to be covered.  Since I cover only special needs, that was what I reported.

Tina Cruz
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-9121-LA-Special-Needs-Kids-Examiner~y2009m9d26-CDC-quietly-revises-autism-numbers-to-1-of-US-children</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Sept. 26, I wrote an article as <span class="caps">LA </span>Special Needs Kids Examiner regarding the increase in autism 1 to 100. While I first read the information in Kirby&#8217;s article, quoting Grossman, I also read it at Adventures in Autism as well.  I wanted to write a story about it, and therefore, needed to do the research to verify it.</p>
<p>My search led me to the <span class="caps">CDC</span> website, where I found information that had been changed to read, &#8220;1 to 300 to 1 in 100 with an average of 1 in 150&#8221; quoted for rates of autism.  Since I was very familiar with the old numbers, 1 in 150, I believed this was news. I also found a cached page that showed that the <span class="caps">CDC</span> had changed the numbers without informing the public, and I wrote an article about it.  At that point, I was not aware of an embargo.  I simply saw news that needed to be reported, and mainstream journalism had dropped the ball.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know the motivation for the embargo, but it seems there was other, more important news on Friday afternoon that outlets believed needed to be covered.  Since I cover only special needs, that was what I reported.</p>
<p>Tina Cruz<br />
<a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-9121-LA-Special-Needs-Kids-Examiner~y2009m9d26-CDC-quietly-revises-autism-numbers-to-1-of-US-children" rel="nofollow">http://www.examiner.com/examin.....S-children</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2009/10/autism-rate-of-1-percent-and-the-embargo-that-wasnt/#comment-66110</link>
		<dc:creator>Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 04:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=3288#comment-66110</guid>
		<description>Alison Singer,

Mr. Kirby seems to be a little inconsistent in what his role is.   On the one hand, he has a past history in journalism.  On the other hand, he goes to DC to brief legislators on behalf of advocacy groups.

Alibris books has a signed copy of Evidence of Harm for sale.  The inscription is listed as:

&quot;Thnak you so much / for your service to / the autism community. / Keep up the work! / David Kirby&quot;

I don&#039;t know how an independent journalist could thank someone on behalf of the autism community.

I don&#039;t see how David Kirby can either, but that is another story entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alison Singer,</p>
<p>Mr. Kirby seems to be a little inconsistent in what his role is.   On the one hand, he has a past history in journalism.  On the other hand, he goes to DC to brief legislators on behalf of advocacy groups.</p>
<p>Alibris books has a signed copy of Evidence of Harm for sale.  The inscription is listed as:</p>
<p>&#8220;Thnak you so much / for your service to / the autism community. / Keep up the work! / David Kirby&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how an independent journalist could thank someone on behalf of the autism community.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how David Kirby can either, but that is another story entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison Singer</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2009/10/autism-rate-of-1-percent-and-the-embargo-that-wasnt/#comment-66108</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=3288#comment-66108</guid>
		<description>I thought David Kirby considered himself press. He describes himself as an &quot;independent journalist&quot;. Why was he even on the call that was designated for advocates?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought David Kirby considered himself press. He describes himself as an &#8220;independent journalist&#8221;. Why was he even on the call that was designated for advocates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2009/10/autism-rate-of-1-percent-and-the-embargo-that-wasnt/#comment-66102</link>
		<dc:creator>Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=3288#comment-66102</guid>
		<description>Visitor,

I don&#039;t care what sort of holiday features Mr. Kirby may have been writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Visitor,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care what sort of holiday features Mr. Kirby may have been writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Socrates</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2009/10/autism-rate-of-1-percent-and-the-embargo-that-wasnt/#comment-66097</link>
		<dc:creator>Socrates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=3288#comment-66097</guid>
		<description>And on the BBC, the prevalence rate played second fiddle to MMR-Autism de-bunking:&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/health/8268302.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Latest autism figures should dispel any fears about the MMR jab being linked to the condition, say experts&lt;/a&gt;.

These are desperate times for the Militia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And on the <span class="caps">BBC</span>, the prevalence rate played second fiddle to <span class="caps">MMR</span>-Autism de-bunking:<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/health/8268302.stm" rel="nofollow">Latest autism figures should dispel any fears about the <span class="caps">MMR</span> jab being linked to the condition, say experts</a>.</p>
<p>These are desperate times for the Militia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2009/10/autism-rate-of-1-percent-and-the-embargo-that-wasnt/#comment-66096</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=3288#comment-66096</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Age of Autism blog is still trying to fan the flames, pushing the idea that the mainstream media doesn’t want to cover this story. Mark Blaxill posted a piece today, Autism News: Pathetic Non Coverage, discussing how his home-town newspaper (The Boston Globe) didn’t cover the story when the embargo lifted on Monday.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That is an incomprehensible point of view to me. The CDC survey stories are all over the place. Contrast this with coverage of the NHS adult prevalence study (the first of its kind ever) which was covered by a handful of news outlets, mostly in the UK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<blockquote>The Age of Autism blog is still trying to fan the flames, pushing the idea that the mainstream media doesn&#8217;t want to cover this story. Mark Blaxill posted a piece today, Autism News: Pathetic Non Coverage, discussing how his home-town newspaper (The Boston Globe) didn&#8217;t cover the story when the embargo lifted on Monday.</p></blockquote>
<p>That is an incomprehensible point of view to me. The <span class="caps">CDC</span> survey stories are all over the place. Contrast this with coverage of the <span class="caps">NHS</span> adult prevalence study (the first of its kind ever) which was covered by a handful of news outlets, mostly in the UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Visitor</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2009/10/autism-rate-of-1-percent-and-the-embargo-that-wasnt/#comment-66092</link>
		<dc:creator>Visitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=3288#comment-66092</guid>
		<description>You have to remember that David Kirby was writing gay holiday features before he was spoonfed the ludicrous drivel that he published in his book.  He has shown himself to be quite without any ethical standards or professional disclipline.  He&#039;s a grubby opportunist, who would not only betray an embargo, but then make up a story to insinuate that it was imposed for some improper reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to remember that David Kirby was writing gay holiday features before he was spoonfed the ludicrous drivel that he published in his book.  He has shown himself to be quite without any ethical standards or professional disclipline.  He&#8217;s a grubby opportunist, who would not only betray an embargo, but then make up a story to insinuate that it was imposed for some improper reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
