<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IACC full committee meeting tomorrow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2009/11/iacc-full-committee-meeting-tomorrow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2009/11/iacc-full-committee-meeting-tomorrow/</link>
	<description>Autism news and opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:15:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RAJ</title>
		<link>http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2009/11/iacc-full-committee-meeting-tomorrow/#comment-69188</link>
		<dc:creator>RAJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/?p=3543#comment-69188</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe that this topic is under discussion:

&quot;Will adding or significantly re-writing chapters be helpful or confusing to the research community? Does this vary by chapter&quot;?
 
&quot;Will adding/deleting objectives each year be helpful or confusing to the research community? Does this vary by chapter&quot;?

Let us not confuse the research community any more than they are already confused. Lets ignore new relevant studies that would re-prioritize the next strategic plan.

Only in a government bureacracy would this even come under discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe that this topic is under discussion:</p>
<p>&#8220;Will adding or significantly re-writing chapters be helpful or confusing to the research community? Does this vary by chapter&#8221;?</p>
<p>&#8220;Will adding/deleting objectives each year be helpful or confusing to the research community? Does this vary by chapter&#8221;?</p>
<p>Let us not confuse the research community any more than they are already confused. Lets ignore new relevant studies that would re-prioritize the next strategic plan.</p>
<p>Only in a government bureacracy would this even come under discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
