Mike vs Observer

22 Jul

Mike clarifies latest Observer clarification….Read More

3 Responses to “Mike vs Observer”

  1. mike stanton July 22, 2007 at 12:31 #

    Hi Kev,
    thank’s for the link. Ben has a new one up as well.

    And Holfordwatch may have to change its name to Observerwatch soon!

  2. Brian Deer July 22, 2007 at 19:05 #

    My suggestion is that people should write to the Observer and suggest that, since there is still so much confusion about the duty of reporters, and what – on this matter of grave public interest, affecting the safety of children – are a newspaper’s reasonable duties to accuracy, the Observer should join with the complaining readers and refer the matter – jointly and with agreement – to the Press Complaints Commission for adjudication.

    See what they say to that!

  3. Jon July 29, 2007 at 11:18 #

    Apologies for dropping a link, but I was especially disappointed that the Observer have still not corrected their suggestion that US MMR contained thimerosal. No mention of MMR this week, as far as I can tell – maybe they’re hoping that this will go away if they keep quiet about it?

Comments are closed.