Autism News Beat is a new blog that looks to become:
….a resource for journalists looking for accurate, evidence-based information about autism.
Lets hope it can reach its intended audience!
Autism News Beat is a new blog that looks to become:
….a resource for journalists looking for accurate, evidence-based information about autism.
Lets hope it can reach its intended audience!
Comments are closed.
| Ryan Wagener on Mr. Wright, is autism an epide… | |
| Sullivan (Matt Carey… on Reportedly, Mark Blaxill is a… | |
| Dorit Rubinstein Rei… on Reportedly, Mark Blaxill is a… | |
| Blog Post 2: What… on Looking back at two decades of… | |
| Chris on Want the Nobel Prize for Warp… |
Yes, this is a different topic than typical for this blog. But, let’s consider a simple and obvious lie by our president: the As is typical for this president, this project involves multiple lies. Here are but two. First, the White House would not be changed itself. Just added to. As noted in a recent […]
How does one recapture trust in the public health system? I can tell you one way to make it worse. Put Mark Baxill to work at the CDC. Mr. Blaxill is a long time anti-vaccine activist who has done a lot of harm promoting the “vaccines cause autism” lie. We on this blog have been […]
The same people who might value your efforts with Operation Warp Speed will also be able to do the simple math in their heads that says Mr. Kennedy’s approach is going to kill people. Mr. Trump, there is a lot of chatter about you wanting the Nobel Peace Prize. OK, I know you’ve publicly stated […]
We pay for the CDC. It isn’t there to support Mr. Kennedy’s agenda. It’s there to generate good information that Mr. Kennedy can use or, sadly, not use. He can’t ask them to sign off on dangerous vaccine policy and then cry “restore trust” to excuse firing the trusted experts who are, in his own […]
I will state this straight out–I believe the anti vaccine movement has put good people at risk for decades with their rhetoric. And I also believe Mr. Kennedy has contributed a great deal to this climate of hate. How much or how directly he may have influenced the gunman who opened fire at the CDC […]
It is good to see Neurodiversity Hub bloggers finally embracing the evidence based concept. You DO understand that Applied Behavior Analysis is an evidence based intervention for autism don’t you? To date the ONLY evidence based intervention shown to be effective as a health and education intervention for autistic children?
Yes….?
I understand that ABA is believed to be evidence based. I also understand that this belief is based on non-randomized trials, and a complete lack of adult outcome studies. Do you, Harold?
I might be very much interested in science, and also respect the scientific method in opposition to pseudo-science, as I clearly do, but that’s completely different to bending over to authority or sacred cows, and believing something is evidence-based because some big respectable organization says so. I care about facts, data and methodology.
Mr. Doherty: How do you explain the fact that in lovaas 1987 there was such a low ratio (11 boys 8 girls) in the control group that this control group could have possibly been a representative sample of autistics when studies have repeatedly found a 4 to 1 ratio of boys to girls among autistics. Also, the fact that a variety of studies, including the recent epedimiologic study released by the CDC have shown that at the lower functioning levels of autism, female autistics generally have lower tested cognitive abilities than boys. Clearly your claim that this is evidenced based is not based on a representative sample of autistics. Also the fact that pre-treatment and post-treatment measures used were not the same and no evidence is suggested that the pre-test measurements are predictors of post-test. also, so many tests were used we do not know who got what test and there is just a range of scores given and no individual scores in this study.
ABA is your opiate, but i don’t think it will enable your son to function at the level you would like him to.
Not to mention, I don’t find any study using only 19 test subjects to be at all conclusive. We have starting points; we don’t have solid and incontrovertable facts.