Arc of California action alert: call your state representative now

1 Feb

Budgets are tight in California, with a multi billion dollar deficit projected. The current plan is to cut developmental services budgets by $750 million dollars. Now is the time to call or, if you can, attend hearings in Sacramento.

If you can call, here are the instructions:

* Click on The Arc’s Legislative Action Center: http://capwiz.com/thearc/state/main/?state=CA&view=myofficials.
* Enter your ZIP code and click on “Go”
* Scroll down to “State Senators,” and click on it.
* Click on “contacts” and call your senator’s Sacramento office (unless you know someone who works in the senator’s district office).
* Do the same with “State Representatives.”

If you aren’t from California, my bet is your governments are facing tight budgets too. Now is a good time to find out where and how you can support your communities during these tough times.

Dear Friends,

Thank you sincerely to everyone planning to come to Sacramento this Thursday and again next Thursday, and to everyone who has phoned your local state senator and assemblymember.

For those who haven’t yet planned to come or haven’t called yet — the developmental disability community needs your advocacy now!

If you already know about the very real threat facing our community, please just scroll to the bottom of this Action Alert for the specifics about what you need to do to help fight it. If not, read on ….

Governor Brown’s proposed budget cuts would gut the Lanterman Act’s promise that people with developmental disabilities will get the services and supports they need to live full lives in the community.

If the cuts happen, you could lose all of your services. There is no way to know until after they pass, if they do. This is serious.

The Arc and other disability organizations are fighting in the Capitol to protect our community’s services. To limit the damage, we need a strong show of support from the community. That means you and the people you know throughout the state.

The threat is caused by the state’s massive budget shortfall, probably the worst since the Great Depression. To balance the budget, Governor Brown has proposed more than $12 billion in cuts and about the same amount in revenue increases by continuing some existing taxes by five years.

In developmental services, that would mean cuts to services of more than three quarters of a billion dollars — real, new cuts, over and above continuing the much smaller 2009 and 2010 cuts. The total cut this year would include the federal matching funds we would lose as a result of the state fund cuts.

It’s hard to grasp how much a cut that large would reduce the Lanterman Act services, especially because the governor hasn’t said exactly where the ax would fall. This is more than twice the disatrous cuts we suffered in 2009.

We do know that most of the cuts probably would come from imposing what are called statewide “service standards.”

“Service standards” sounds good, doesn’t it? But what it means is simply eliminating the IPP team’s ability to pick the services and supports that the person with the disability needs, the key promise of the Lanterman Act. The 2009 caps on respite care and Early Start are the most recent examples of “service standards.”

Under the Lanterman Act, IPP teams write plans to reflect the specific needs of individuals, but with the cuts being proposed this process would certainly be harmed dramatically.

Real life consequences to real life people throughout the state are the kinds of things you should communicate to the legislative committees in Sacramento and to your local state senator and assemblymember. Tell them the cut is just too big to bear!

What You Need to Do!

The Legislature has scheduled just two public hearings in the cuts before taking action. Here is when and where:

* 9:30 a.m. or later, this Thursday, February 3, Room 4202, State Capitol, Sacramento. This is the Assembly heating
* 9:30 a.m. or later, next February 10, Room 4203, State Capitol, Sacramento. This is the Senate hearing.

We need to fill the rooms with people who can briefly tell the legislators what elimination of services would mean to you and those you care for.

And whether or not you can come to Sacramento, please make two calls to your local state senator and assemblymember this week. When you call, get the name of the person you’re talking to, so you can cal him or her again next time. Think of this as the beginning of a relationship. Tell him or her why you care, and that Governor Brown’s proposed cut in developmental services is just too big.

If you already know someone who works for the senator or assemblymember, either in Sacramento or in your local area, call him or her. If not, please call their Sacramento offices. here’s How to get their numbers:

* Click on The Arc’s Legislative Action Center: http://capwiz.com/thearc/state/main/?state=CA&view=myofficials.
* Enter your ZIP code and click on “Go”
* Scroll down to “State Senators,” and click on it.
* Click on “contacts” and call your senator’s Sacramento office (unless you know someone who works in the senator’s district office).
* Do the same with “State Representatives.”

And I hope to see you in this week and next week.

Thank you for your advocacy.

Greg

P.S. Thanks, too, to everyone who forward my last Action Alert to others. Please forward this one to everyone you know too! We need a very strong show of support to reduce the size of these cuts.

Greg deGiere
Public Policy Director
The Arc of California
1225 – 8th Street, Suite 350
Sacramento, CA 95816
916-552-6619 x16 (office)
916-223-7319 (mobile)
916-441-3494 (fax)

6 Responses to “Arc of California action alert: call your state representative now”

  1. Leila February 1, 2011 at 16:42 #

    I work so I can’t be there for the public hearings. I hope they can get enough people there! I’m spreading the word.

    • Sullivan February 1, 2011 at 18:47 #

      Leila,

      you can call! They have instructions for that.

  2. Ian MacGregor February 1, 2011 at 19:12 #

    I wonder how many people are happy with their regional centers. I’ve had an “advocate” from a regional center argue for fewer services than a school district was willing to provide. Do the Regional Centers have any responsibility to assure the residential facilities with which they contract ares safe?

    Cutting back on them makes no sense. Early-intervention programs are run through regional services as are programs for those over 22. But, I also see them as a poorly performing bureaucracy.

  3. stanley seigler February 6, 2011 at 22:14 #

    Here are some comments (my notes) from the 3feb hearing. You can view it at http://www.calchannel.com/channel/viewvideo/2012

    there will be another 10 feb…assume it will be on the web as well.

    i watched the original on the web…does anyone know where i can find hard copies of the testimony…someone posted art boltons testimony which i will post here…

    there was a great turnout.

    stanley seigler

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    my post to another site (autismca)

    A pleasant part of the hearing was seeing/hearing Art Bolton…if one person could claim the authorship of the lanterman act, its Art…he and Lanterman are heroes of the DD/autism community…and a gentleman

    Some notes/comments/opines

    caveat: cant read my writing and couldn*t hear the testimony that well…corrections/clarifications welcome.

    Missed most of DDS presentation…it was mostly toeing the administration line (whats new)…however there was a plus…DDS would cut the $750M to $1B from growth budget not from current budget…another crumb…

    the $750M should have been (at the least) cut from a [current] needs budget which DDS/RCs (and providers) have never submitted…then with the $750M cut, DDS might be back to the 2002 budget (adjusted for growth)…[all budgets are based on historic cost data]

    assemblyman Jim Beall ask [DDS] was Lanterman gone…if so DDS needs to tell us…of course DDS came back with expected response: gonna do everything to maintain Lanterman…this is impossible with cuts and POS (purchase of service) standards.

    Beall continued…arbitrary cuts NOT deserved…they would be the end of Lanterman

    Cuts are the end of lanterman and POS standards gut Lanterman…these points made by most participants.

    DDS was not asked if they intended to mislead legs and legs were not asked if would be misled as happened in 2009…

    Assemblyman Chesboro (believe) made comment impact on providers is a direct impact on the consumer.

    Public testimony

    Most comments emphasized cuts can NOT happen. They will end lanterman and POS standards gut lanterman…public not as nice as in some past hearings…DDS survey to determine POS standards was bs…no providers, then no need for DDS/RCs…

    one good public point was any POS standards should/must be quality standards [not cost standards]…didn’t get them…but an example from another state:

    People*s goals reflect important aspects of their lives
    A. Do I have support to identify and develop my personal goals?
    B. Do people know what I want to achieve?
    C. Do my goals reflect my strengths and talents?
    D. Are my goals individualized and reflect what I want to do?
    E. Do I and my guardian receive support in actively participating in my ISP and other planning efforts?

    stanley seigler

  4. stanley seigler February 6, 2011 at 22:23 #

    Art Bolton’ testimony at 3Feb, CA-USA Assembly Budget Hearing…

    stanley seigler

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Hello members of the committee. My name is Art Bolton…this sort of a wholesale, pie-in-the-sky cut is going to solve the state*s economic problems – that*s foolishness and is going to hurt a lot of people. [ref say]

    COMMENT:
    oh gosh…great to hear from art again…as mentioned: * A pleasant part of the hearing was seeing/hearing Art Bolton…if one person could claim the authorship of the lanterman act, its Art…he and Lanterman are heroes of the DD/autism community…and a gentleman*
    lisa, thanks for posting…
    stanley seigler

    REF XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXIn AutismCA@yahoogroups.com, Lisa Brown wrote:
    Testimony of Art Bolton: California Assembly Subcommittee #1 – Health and Human Services – February 3, 2011

    Hello members of the committee. My name is Art Bolton. It*s a pleasure to be here in this room again. I see Jess Unruh*s picture looking down on us. He hired me in 1963 to staff the Assembly committee selected to look at our programs for people w/ developmental disabilities.

    At that time the governor, the recipient of bad advice, had a plan to expand the state hospitals. He had appropriated 47 million dollars in his budget to go ahead and start building more hospitals, because they were terribly over crowded and the conditions were bad; something had to be done. He turned to his department, he turned to Dept of finance. *What shall we do?* They came in with a number, 47 million. Why not that number? Go ahead.

    Well the families who would be affected, who had children in the state institutions and who were on a waiting list, those families were upset. They didn*t want more state hospitals. So they went to Speaker Unruh and they said: *Can the legislature do something?,* and he said: *Well I don*t know, we*ll investigate it.*

    He put together a bipartisan committee. Frank Lanterman was on that committee and they quickly decided that what was needed was not more state hospitals, but some sort of alternative in the community and there wasn*t anything, so they invented the California system for people with developmental disability, which now serves 240,000 people, employs over 100,000 workers and is a model for the nation. Great thing.

    Well now, all these years later, here comes the son and he*s the governor, and he*s got a problem. He turns to his department, he turns to finance and says: *What should we do?* They come up with a number of 750 million dollars. That sounds like a fair, reasonable number, and the poor dears, they don*t know, but they don*t look at the larger picture.

    The governor didn*t ask the right questions. For example: *How many people will get laid off?* My estimate is that with this kind of size of a cut, you*re going to loose roughly 15,000 workers. Who are these workers? These are not jobs that can be shipped to China. These are American jobs in the private sector. Keep in mind Frank Lanterman was a conservative republican and he helped to engineer this system from the beginning and stayed with it.

    It doesn*t make sense to dismantle this system andput 20,000 people out of work. They*ll all be eligible for food stamps, unemployment insurance, welfare. What*s that cost and does that offset that 750 million or maybe what portion of it? Does anybody know? Has that question been asked? I think its important because you can*t just look at the small details and have meetings on how to distribute the cuts, you have to look at the larger picture. What*s the social impact?

    What*s the economic impact? That*s part of the work needs to be done.
    I urge this committee to take the lead in drawing the line saying *We*re not necessarily going to play this game. We*re going to take our time. We*re going to ask the right questions. We*re going to investigate.* If some cuts are warranted, fine, but this sort of a wholesale, pie-in-the-sky cut is going to solve the state*s economic problems – that*s foolishness and is going to hurt a lot of people.

    A PDF file of this above approximation of Art Bolton’s testimony is attached. To see the testimony as it was delivered, please use the following link and then move the slider to 3:26:40. <>
    Lisa Brown

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Tweets that mention Autism Blog - Arc of California action alert: call your state representative now « Left Brain/Right Brain -- Topsy.com - February 1, 2011

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kev, Liz Ditz. Liz Ditz said: Live in California? Have a child with a #disability? Call your state senator & representative about budget cuts http://bit.ly/hrS6I9 […]

Leave a reply to stanley seigler Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.