One issue that comes up a lot is the reliability of parents’ memories about the development of their children. This can be especially hard the more time that passes and we look back, potentially “telescoping” events. In a recent study, researchers from the University of Michigan, including Catherine Lord, look at telescoping of reports. What they found what that as time went on, parent reports language delays changed. As time went on, parents reported language delays where delays weren’t reported when the children were younger. Interestingly to me, age of “symptom onset” increased with time. I find this interesting because I have read a few discussions online where as time has gone on, parents have reported “symptom onset” occurred at earlier ages. Reports of age of first concerns of delays, daytime bladder control and independent walking did not vary with time.
Here is the abstract.
Telescoping of caregiver report on the Autism Diagnostic Interview – Revised.
Abstract
Background: Delays in development are a fundamental feature in diagnosing autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Age of language acquisition, usually obtained through retrospective caregiver report, is currently used to distinguish between categories within ASD. Research has shown that caregivers often report children as having acquired developmental milestones earlier or later than they were actually achieved. The current study examines the extent to which this phenomenon, referred to as ‘telescoping,’ impacts retrospective reports provided by caregivers of children with ASD.
Methods: Participants were 127 caregivers of children referred for possible ASD or non-spectrum developmental delay. Caregivers were interviewed when children were 2, 3, 5, and 9 years of age. Caregiver-reported ages of first concern, language and non-diagnostic developmental milestones and interviewer-estimated age of onset were compared over time using linear models.
Results: Significant telescoping of language milestones resulted in more children meeting language delay criteria as they grew older, in spite of original reports that their language was not delayed. There was little evidence of consistent telescoping of caregiver-reported ages of first concern, daytime bladder control, and independent walking. With time, the interviewers’ judged ages of symptom onset increased, but remained prior to age three.
Conclusions: Telescoping of caregiver-reported ages of language acquisition has implications for both clinical diagnosis and genetic studies using these milestones to increase homogeneity of samples. Results support proposals to remove specific age-based criteria in the diagnosis of ASD. Telescoping should be considered when working with any clinical population in which retrospectively recalled events are used in diagnosis.
Yes, we’d like to think we are all excellent at recalling details about our kid’s development. But sometimes memory is not the best gauge. Sometimes data is best.
The book “Kluge” by Gary Marcus has some excellent data on just how labile (adjustable) memory can be.
Memory is labile. Records or not. It’s not that hard, as Shannon Rosa explains:
Does your child with autism have a daily record?
It’s really just an extension of what a lot of parents do in the first few months after the baby is born. It’s particularly helpful for children who don’t use a lot of expressive language.
Oops.
“Memory is labile. Records or not”
Should read
“Memory is labile. Records are not”
Didn’t notice the typo until after the editing period had expired.