So, Mr. Kennedy, why do you cite corrupt journals?

Robert Kennedy, Secretary of Health and Human Services, has two conflicting statements out in the past couple of days. Earlier this week he stated that he might bar people at HHS from publishing in certain journals. They are “corrupt”, you see. And they have to change their ways. Here’s how Politico described Mr. Kennedy’s comments:

Speaking on the “Ultimate Human” podcast, Kennedy said the New England Journal of Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet, three of the most influential medical journals in the world, were “corrupt” and publish studies funded and approved by pharmaceutical companies.

“Unless those journals change dramatically, we are going to stop NIH scientists from publishing in them and we’re going to create our own journals in-house,” he said, referring to the National Institutes of Health, an HHS agency that is the world’s largest funder of health research.

We can discuss why Mr. Kennedy did that. For example, he needs to discredit the journals that have (and likely will continue to) show that his “Gold Standard Science” is nonsense (see the citations at the bottom of this article). But, for the moment, let’s just jump to Mr. Kennedy’s hypocrisy.

You see, he just released “The MAHA Report“. Aside from the fact that it includes made-up citations and, in my opinion, is AI generated slop, it cites the very journals Mr. Kennedy says are corrupt.

Lancet journals are cited 4 times. New England Journal of Medicine is cited 4 times. JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) journals about 44 times.

So, these journals are corrupt. We can’t trust them. But, we should trust Mr. Kennedy to carefully vet those articles that are not corrupt. Because, you know, Gold-Standard Science. Or something like that.

—

By Matt Carey

Association between thimerosal-containing vaccine and autism (Journal of the American Medical Association)

Conclusion: The results do not support a causal relationship between childhood vaccination with thimerosal-containing vaccines and development of autistic-spectrum disorders.

also

Autism Occurrence by MMR Vaccine Status Among US Children With Older Siblings With and Without Autism

Conclusions and Relevance  In this large sample of privately insured children with older siblings, receipt of the MMR vaccine was not associated with increased risk of ASD, regardless of whether older siblings had ASD. These findings indicate no harmful association between MMR vaccine receipt and ASD even among children already at higher risk for ASD.