Did Jake Crosby close “Autism Investigated”?

25 Sep

There is/was a blog called “autism investigated”. If you are unaware of it, consider yourself lucky. It is/was a cesspool. Take one of the worst of the anti-vaccine bloggers (so bad that even the Age of Autism blog split with him), add a hefty level of misogyny, and then go full Trump supporter and you had Jake’s “autism investigated”.

As of now autisminvestigated.com website gives this:

As noted Jake became an ardent Trump supporter, in addition to his anti-science and anti-vaccine views. He also took on a very self-defeating view of why he was unsuccessful socially.

WaPo Wants Autistic Men to Fuck Even Less

What autists need to do is get over their extreme anxiety when it comes to women, not worsen it by worrying about make-believe “boundaries” established by feminists and “autistic” cuck reporters. It’s almost as if the author wants everyone else to be as dry as he is down there; he’s just picking autists as an easy target.

RESEARCH: Autistic Women More Likely To Be Dykes

And, let’s not forget how he characterized gender reassignment surgery as “genital mutilation” (allying with alt-right activist Milo Yiannopoulos)

Facebook Censors Milo Yiannopoulos For Condemning Transgender Genital Mutilation of Autistic People

Apparently he wasn’t alone in sabotaging his own desires to find female companionship. He seems to have allied with a former commenter on this blog (whom I had completely forgotten until I read this): Autism’s Gadfly on Why Nobody Wants to Fuck Us

It looks like his Facebook page is down as well. I hope Jake has indeed moved on. It would be great if he’s decided to analyze his efforts to date and move on. Unlikely, but it would be good for him.


By Matt Carey

Shelter in Place saved lives

25 Sep

When people claim that shelter in place orders didn’t save people, they are just wrong. When people say we didn’t “bend the curve”, they are just wrong. And this sort of misinformation will lead to people dying.

This is obviously a non autism post. Sadly, the same people (many of them autism parents) who have spent years promoting misinformation about autism, autism ‘cures’, and vaccines are now talking about the COVID-19 pandemic. So I felt it appropriate to speak to some of this misinformation.

This is also a lot of graphs.  But the bottom line is simple: we were in a runaway situation.  Cases were doubling every 5 days.  In a few weeks after shelter in place we would have had our hospitals overwhelmed.

There is a push against the shelter-in-place orders that were put in place to slow the spread of the virus SARS-CoV-2. I’m sure we will be debating for years to come what the best plan should have been. But what is not a debate is whether the shelter in place orders limited the spread and, in so doing, saved lives.

I live in Santa Clara County, which was one of the first counties to institute shelter-in-place (SIP) on March 17, 2020. While I was surprised by the order, the reasoning was already becoming clear: the virus was spreading in our county at an alarming rate. I had been watching the numbers day by day, and we were seeing a case count doubling every 5 days. New York City was clearly seeing the start a huge outbreak at this time.. In a little over a month previous Italy had seen deaths rise from near zero to 6,000 per day. That’s one month.

I pulled the data to see what happened here in Santa Clara county.  And, more importantly,  what could have happened.

Here’s a graph that would have faced the public health staff in Santa Clara County in mid March:

COVID-19 cases in Santa Clara County as of March 17

Looks like an exponential, and this is exactly what it is.   Cases were growing fast.  Here’s a fit to those data using an exponential growth curve:

That’s a very good fit to the data. Cases were doubling every 5 days. With that sort of growth, we were not very far behind NYC. Keep in mind, this is just a count of who was being diagnosed with COVID-19.  A lot of cases were not, so there was a lot more COVID in the community than these few hundred cases.  The shelter in place order is at day 25.

Put yourself in a public health official’s place. You see these data, what does that tell you about the future? Well, since it’s an exponential, we can use the fit to  predict. Consider 4 weeks out from the date of shelter in place. Ask, how much would the epidemic have grown in that time? The curve tells us: we would have grown to about 93,000 identified cases (assuming testing could keep up).

When you are covering this much of an increase, it’s often helpful to use a semi-log plot.  In that case the exponential curve is a straight line (same data, graphed differently):

Let’s overlay the actual case count on top of this line.  We can ask  ” did we bend the curve”? Absolutely. Here are the data:

Very soon after the shelter in place order (day 25) the case count diverges from the projection.  The curve was being bent.  By 4 weeks out from the shelter in place order, and the number of cases was 50 times lower than what would have happened without any actions to mitigate the spread.

50 times lower.

This is even more clear if we go back to a non log plot:

You can barely see the black line for the case count on this graph.  By day 50, the actual number of cases is well below the prediction. And that means lives were saved.

At the time, the fatality rate was unclear, there were estimates of about 4% of those identified as covid positive dying (the “case fatality rate”). Current statistics put the case-fatality rate in the U.S. at about 2.9% . With 3% case fatality, we were looking at almost 3,000 people dead by a month after the shelter in place . And that number would have continued growing steeply had we not taken measures to mitigate the spread.

It is worth keeping this in mind: if the hospitals were overwhelmed, the case-fatality ratio would have been higher. More people would have died. 90,000 cases would have absolutely overwhelmed our hospitals. Even with the extra capacity in the temporary hospital set up in our convention center. That hospital had only 250 beds. Not all of the 90,000 cases would have required hospitalization. But there would have been enough to swamp our hospitals.

Santa Clara County lost about 150 people in the first wave of the pandemic (it’s hard to say precisely where the cutoff for “first wave” would be, but somewhere about 150-200 looking at the trend). It could have been 10 times higher, or even more than that.

When people claim that shelter in place orders didn’t save people, they are just wrong. When people say we didn’t “bend the curve”, they are just wrong. And this sort of misinformation will lead to people dying.


By Matt Carey

We needed the IACC in 2020. It’s past time to re-form it

13 Sep

The U.S. has a committee called the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee. It’s mandated by law, a law that has been periodically renewed. Most recently as the Autism CARES Act of 2019, public law 116-60. Signed into law on Sept. 30, 2019, nearly a year ago.

I was a member of a previous incarnation of the IACC. The IACC is limited in what it can do, but there are areas where it is uniquely capable of action. Let’s use the pandemic as an example:

The IACC could bring together experts to share what is known about how the pandemic would affect the autism communities. What strategies work for remote learning for autistic students? What strategies might help for group homes where individuals are unable to get out into the community? What are the medical considerations of a disease like COVID-19 on autistic people?

The IACC brings in experts in each meeting to discuss topics of importance to the community. The topics above and more could be covered. Recommendations and information could be gathered and written into reports and web pages for members of the community to use.

The IACC also recommends research funding strategies. I am 100% certain that there is a lack of information on how the autism communities could best react to the pandemic. Right now is the time to focus research funding into how the pandemic is affecting autistic people and what works and what doesn’t. Because there will be another pandemic.

The last IACC term ended with the sunset of the previous Autism CARES Act, at the end of September in 2019.

In the best of times, there is no reason for the IACC to go through such a long hiatus. These are not the best of times. The IACC would have to meet remotely, but that is no reason to not form a new committee. The best work of the IACC is done outside of the meetings, gathering and reporting on research. We need that now.

By Matt Carey

So Anti Vaccine Crowd, how did that campaign for Trump thing work out for you?

12 Sep

In 2016 the anti vaccine community was very excited to have a candidate who lent them credibility. They always crave credibility and will latch on to anyone who does so. Think Robert Kennedy Jr., Del Bigtree, Andrew Wakefield, the whole raft of charlatans that any reasonable movement would cut loose. But in 2016 they had Donald Trump, who evolved from dark horse candidate to Republican nominee to president.

Donald Trump had tweeted the vaccines cause autism lie:

Trump lies about vaccines to get attention

Trump lies about vaccines to get attention

And had made other comments about autism and vaccines.

By this time most people understood Donald Trump. He’s a shameless self promoter who likes to take controversial positions to get attention (birther conspiracy, anyone? He even revisited birtherism with Kamala Harris).

Being a conspiracy theorist wouldn’t alienate Trump from the anti-vaccine community. Far from it. Just as they deny their own conspiracy theory roots, they will look past this in Trump. And being a loud mouth who is often wrong? Well, that sums up JB Handley to a T.

Trump flirted with the anti-vaccine movement and the anti-vaccine movement fell in love. JB Handley (anti-vaccine activist who uses his position as an autism parent in his campaign) wrote an article: Trumps Stands with my Son, I Stand with Trump with comments like “If ending the Autism epidemic is your top priority, how in the world can you vote Democrat? rel=’nofollow'”.

Let’s leave aside that the “autism is an epidemic caused by vaccines” is doubly wrong. Many of us responded at the time: if having respect for people with disabilities (such as your son, Brad) were any sort of priority, how could you vote for Trump? Trump clearly doesn’t respect people with disabilities. For example:

Why would an autism parent support this?

Why would an autism parent support this?

That said, JB Handley and many others in the anti-vaccine movement (including other autism parents) clearly don’t respect people with disabilities. Remember when Del Bigtree compared autistics to dogs and exotic chimpanzees while autism parents Mark Blaxill and Ginger Taylor laughed?

Many of us autism parents prioritize our kids and the autistic community in general. We feel that respect and rights for people with disabilities is a paramount issue. And Trump had no disability plans in his platform. But the anti-vaccine movement, even the autism parents, do not place such a high value on respect for people with disabilities. In fact, they disparage it as trying to “normalize” disability (I got a hint for you all–disability *is* a normal part of being human).

Here we are 4 years later. Donald Trump not only hasn’t taken up the anti vaccine banner, hasn’t taken up the “autism is a vaccine induced epidemic!” campaign, he’s now throwing money into the development of new vaccines and actively trying to get the vaccines to market before they can complete safety and efficacy testing.

Instead of “draining the swamp”, he’s pressuring the CDC and the FDA to become part of his political machine, where independent science isn’t reported but rather science-like support for Trump’s messaging are allowed.

The irony is thick. The anti-vaccine movement got the exact opposite of what they hoped for.

So I wonder what they are thinking now. How much do they know that they were played? And do they care that they were played?

I haven’t done much digging on this, but I did run across this from “you are so charming Del, I’ll laugh at your autistics-as-dogs remark” Ginger Taylor:

Yeah, she’s on to Trump. But she still backs him.

It’s rare for the anti-vaccine movement to admit even this much of a mistake (JB Handley, for example is very much in the Trump mold. Including the ‘never apologize, never admit mistakes’.)

I do wonder if somewhere, hidden from view, there have been discussions of “well, we were played by Trump” among the anti-vaccine community.


By Matt Carey

YouTube gives Del Bigtree the boot…about 4 years too late

4 Aug

Del Bigtree was a mediocrity who found he could gather a following (and make money) by joining the anti-vaccine bandwagon. He was a minor producer for the daytime TV show “The Doctors” before he quit to join Andrew Wakefield’s team creating the fake documentary “Vaxxed”. If you’ve forgotten Del (or never knew who he was), we discussed him and his efforts a great deal during time Vaxxed was being shown. Since then he’s grown his online presence, spreading conspiracy theories, anti-vaccine messages and general bad medical information.

For years Mr. Bigtree has supported demeaning messages about autistic people. For example, he likened autistic children to dogs or “exotic chimpanzees” (while anti vaccine activists Mark Blaxill and Ginger Taylor laughed). He never had the backbone to stand up to the people selling fake–and often abusive–autism “cures”.

He’s been a disaster or the autism communities. We are worse off for his attention.

But YouTube didn’t do anything about that. He was only damaging a small population.

Now we are in the world of COVID-19. A deadly disease. It should come as no surprise that Del moved into spreading misinformation about the pandemic. How better to grow his business? Gather donor/followers and make more money? And he has messages already prepared: fear vaccines, fear expert (except him*)

Yes, Mr. Bigtree has moved into giving people advice that COVID-19 is no problem. I’ve heard he went so far as to recommend people go out and get infected.

So, now Mr. Bigtree is a danger to the general population. To be more precise, he’s more of a danger. His anti-vaccine views have always posed a threat to the general population. But now the threat is immediate.

And now he’s off YouTube.

Mr Bigtree and his community are quick to claim that they suffer. Oh, let’s be honest, people like him love to be singled out. They love to claim that they are so important that the big powers are focused on them (why did it take so damned long if you are so important?). They love to play up the “I struggle to bring you the truth” message. In the end YouTube is a company, a company that both profited from Mr. Bigtree’s videos and (almost certainly) paid Mr. Bigtree based on views. YouTube was well within its rights to remove his misinformation. I’d argue strongly they had a duty to do so. YouTube shouldn’t be making money off efforts that lead to injury or death. They shouldn’t be paying someone to spread that information. And they have no obligation to provide Del Bigtree with a free platform to do so.

For those who have forgotten Mr. Bigtree (or never heard of him), he describes himself glowingly on his website. Here’s the final paragraph of his “Who is Del” blurb:

But Del is probably best known for his powerful speeches that weave shocking truth, searing wit and dynamic passion into an experience that is often described as electrifying.

Here is electrifying Del’s dynamic passion (or is it searing wit?):

By Matt Carey

* There are people who study medicine and infectious diseases. There are washed out musical theater actors (such as Mr Bigtree). The choice is obvious.

Has Generation Rescue disbanded?

3 Aug

It looks like Genertion Rescue has shut it’s doors. If so, make no mistake, this is a very good thing for autistic people and the autism communities.

Their website down. GenerationRescue.org. Follow the link. Or, take this screenshot:

Websites go down. But the GR website has been down for at least a week. And they haven’t posted to Facebook since May 2nd.

We’ve written extensively about Generation Rescue over the years here at Left Brain/Right Brain. GR was founded by JB Handley, now known as one of the main sources of vaccine misinformation.

GR is commonly known for their anti-vaccine stance. Within the autism communities they are known for their focus on denigrating autistic people in order to support the “parent first” narrative of autism as a source of despair. Also, they were known for promoting fake therapies such as chelation. They started out with the message that autism was a “misdiagnosis” for mercury poisoning. They were wrong. Very, very wrong.

But JB believed. He fell for the mercury poisoning lie hook, line and sinker. Generation Rescue’s first website included this quote:

“It is the elimination of this “spark”, i.e. mercury, for which we now have an easy and effective solution. Along with some supportive therapies, autism and certain other neurodegenerative diseases can be fully and permanently reversed. This is NOT a theory but rather, a protocol that has already been clinically validated and the evidence is irrefutable.”

That was 2005. Autism is clearly gone now, right? Mercury was removed from vaccines. The “clinically validated” protocol with “irrefutable” evidence has cured all autistics, right?

Autism as mercury poisoning was a lie. Chelation as a cure was a lie. And that lie was behind how Generation Rescue was born.

It’s surprising they lasted this long.

Good riddance, Generation Rescue. Autistics are better off without you. The autism communities are better off without you. The world is better off without you.


By Matt Carey

Thank you and farewell, Mel

12 Apr

Mel Baggs has passed on. Many may remember the name Amanda Baggs, same person. There is so much one could write about the impact that Mel had on the autism communities and the disability communities and humanity in general. I will not express the sadness I feel, but I want to write about two areas where Mel made a lasting change in my life.

Mel faced intense attacks over the years. Attacks that were mean, cruel, dishonest and worse. But Mel didn’t become mean in response. It was true leadership by example. Mel stayed advocating.

Mel found a partner in life. If memory serves, being together took a fight. My kid was very young then, but Mel helped me to see the future and to see my kid as a full human, not a perpetual infant. Helped me to plan for a time when I might need to fight for my kid’s rights to be a disabled adult. Adult.

I know these are brief comments. But make no mistake, these were powerful and important influences on my life.

I’ll miss you Mel.

Thank you Mel.


By Matt Carey

Lessons for the Day of Remembrance in the COVID19 era

3 Apr

Let me put this more direct:
Everyone is stressed right now. If you think you are at your own limits, find someone to take over. Call family. Call social services. Call someone. Please.

It’s April. For some it’s “autism awareness month”. For others, we remember autistics and other people with disabilities who have been killed by parents or other caregivers.

It’s also April, the second month of “shelter in place” as the COVID19 pandemic brings the world to a halt.

There are two things which scare me more than anything else: losing one of my family and myself dying and not being here to provide for and protect my family. I’ve had to face these fears multiple times in the past. I’ve spent nights wondering if every text I got would be from my wife, who was at the hospital with one kid, telling me that kid had not made it. I spent a day with the misdiagnosis of a huge aneurysm in my brain. Just to name two experiences.

And now I face those fears again. I’m not very old, but old enough to be at risk. I look at my family and wonder about other risk factors. And I live in fear.

Let me focus on my autistic kid for now. It’s one thing in times of relative safety and security to say, “This kid is my whole world” (as are each an every one of my family). But when one faces the very real chance that in a year or two one or both of us may be gone, it gets very real, as they say. And as I face that reality, let me say a few truths:

My kid is not a “burden”. I don’t want that “burden” lifted by one or the other passing.

My kid is a joy. Sure, I want to live as long as I can to be there to support my kid. But I want to live as long as I can to spend time with my kid.

I’ve “walked in the shoes” of the parents who have killed their kids. I spend my life with a kid who is disabled, autistic, and in need of a very high level of support. I can not and I will not forgive or forget those who chose to kill their kids. I will forgive and support people who realize they can not handle the life they have and decide to let someone else take up the responsibility. I’ve traded emails with family members of murdered autistic kids, family members who would have loved to care for those kids. They walked in the very shoes of those who chose to murder. They cared for the same exact kids.

Let me put this more direct:
Everyone is stressed right now. If you think you are at your own limits, find someone to take over. Call family. Call social services. Call someone. Please.


By Matt Carey

WTF Republicans?

23 Mar

Both houses of Congress are working furiously on bills to stimulate the economy following the COVID-19 slowdown. Which is a good thing. But, politicians are politicians and they can’t seem to “waste a good crisis” (as the saying goes).

From the Washington Post: The GOP just smuggled another awful provision into the stimulus

According to language in the bill forwarded to me by a senior Senate Democratic aide, this provision excludes “nonprofits receiving Medicaid expenditures,” which would not be eligible for those loans.

This language has been interpreted in some quarters as an effort to deny funding to Planned Parenthood, a longtime GOP target. But Democratic aides think the language means a lot more than this.

Specifically, Democratic aides believe this language would exclude from eligibility for this financial assistance a big range of other nonprofits that get Medicaid funding, such as home and community-based disability providers; community-based nursing homes, mental health providers and health centers; group homes for the disabled; and even rape crisis centers.

Great. Nonprofits serving people with disabilities would be excluded from this part of the stimulus. Why? Why Republicans, why?


By Matt Carey

What “flattening the curve” means to my family

19 Mar

We hear a lot about “flattening the curve” these days. Here’s what this means to me (click to enlarge):

If hospitals are overwhelmed, my kid will not be high priority. My kid is disabled. If there are a limited number of ICU beds, for example, my kid very likely won’t get one.

So, thank you to everyone who is helping out. Everyone who is taking this seriously. It’s very, very tough, I know. But this is literally life and death for people like my kid.

By Matt Carey