Archive | Autism RSS feed for this section

CDC report 1 in 110 kids are identified autistic

19 Dec

You’ve probably already heard–the CDC’s estimate of the autism rate was announced as 1% today. This was published in an MMWR came out today, with the new CDC prevalence estimate of 1 in 110. I made some notes on the conference call, but I thought it worthwhile to make a few comments on the document itself.

This is the third in the autism prevalence MMWR’s. The first was
Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders — Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, Six Sites, United States, 2000

and

Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders — Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 14 Sites, United States, 2002

This new one is titled

Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders — Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, United States, 2006

In each they estimate the prevalence for 8 year olds. So, the 2000 study was on children born in 1992 and the 2002 study was on children born in 1994. They found prevalences of 1 in 166 (200) and 1 in 150 (2002), respectively.

The new prevalence is 1 in 110 for 2006 (8 year old children born in 1998). This is a big jump, no doubt. It is worth taking very seriously. Unfortunately, it isn’t as simple as saying, “the number of autistic children has increased”.

As the authors note in the introduction:

Since the early 1990s, the number of persons receiving services for ASDs has increased substantially. However, identifying children for services for autism might not be equivalent to using consistent diagnostic standards to identify persons in the population because services within communities are not available uniformly to all persons with ASDs. For this reason, studies that rely exclusively on single-source administrative datasets (e.g., disability service records or annual reports of special education counts) most likely underestimate ASD prevalence and might not adequately capture changes in the ASD population over time

Most of the states reporting in the ADDM use more than a single source. Most use medical and educational records. Those that use a single source (e.g. Florida) show lower prevalence estimates.

Let’s get back to that 1% estimate. This is a big jump in the prevalence–with the previous prevalence being 1 in 150 (about 0.67%). Yes, it should be taken seriously, but at the same time 1% is not a surprising number. The authors list 5 studies that show a prevalence >1%, using other methods.

Note that this is for the 1998 birth cohort, children born 4 years after those studied in the previous MMWR. I bring this up because the “buzz” before the MMWR was discussing this as the 1996 cohort. The studies are not spaced out evenly in time–2000, 2002, 2006.

Methodology
The methodology is through a record screen, not through direct observation of children:

Children aged 8 years with a notation of an ASD or descriptions consistent with an ASD were identified through screening and abstraction of existing health and education records containing professional assessments of the child’s developmental progress at health-care or education facilities.

If on review of the records, the child is deemed to meet the DSM-IV criteria for autism, he/she is counted. This is a good way to get an estimate, but there is a lot of room for children to fall through the cracks, in my opinion. As such, it is and has always been, an underestimate. In some cases, it is probably a very large underestimate. As will be shown below, there is a big variation by state–a factor of 3. I don’t think anyone really believes that the autism prevalence in Florida, or the prevalence amongst Hispanics is much lower than in other states or other ethnicities.

It is interesting to note that the ADDM network does find a significant number of children whom they (the ADDM) categorize as autistic even though they haven’t been given that diagnosis before. About 23% of the autisistics counted in the 1% value were not identified before the ADDM did their review.

That’s worth repeating–about 23% of 8 year olds identified as autistic were mislabeled as non-autistic by their schools, parents and doctors. That’s an interesting fact for those who claim that autism is easily identified.

The CDC study is not capable of explaining whether part of the increase represents a “real” increase in the number of autistic kids. It certainly can’t go into whether or not any specific proposed cause is valid. However, one can use the data to test hypotheses. This type of study just isn’t capable of making claims about causation.

States Reporting to the ADDM

This new study covers children born in 1994 living in 11 states:
Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Missouri, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Wisconsin.

Note that this is different from the last MMWR, which looked at kids born 2 years earlier (1996) and included sites in:
Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Maryland, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Utah, West Virginia , and Wisconsin.

The new study added Florida, but took out Arkansas, New Jersey, Utah and West Virginia. These changes do make it more difficult to compare the prevalence data. They do not explain the increase. By that I mean, it isn’t as though the low prevalence states were removed from the previous MMWR study and high prevalence states were added.

I would have been very interested what happened to the prevalence in New Jersey. The last two MMWRs had New Jersey at about 1%. A good comparison would be if that state had the same autism prevalence or a higher value.

Prevalence by state

Data in Table 2 from the MMWR. Data from 11 states were reported. The prevalence ranged from 4.2 (Florida) to 12.1 per 1,000 (Missouri and Arizona). That’s a big spread, a factor of 3. The highest prevalence was for males in Missouri–19.1 per 1,000 (1.9%, or 1 in 52).

There was some variation in the male:female ratio, from 3.2 (Alabama) to 7.6 (Florida). Again, this shows that there is a big variation by state in how autistics are identified.

Variation by ethnicity.

There is a large difference in the prevalence by ethnicity. This also varies by state. For example, there is a 9.4 White-to-Hispanic ratio in Alabama, but the same ratio is only 0.7 in Florida. In general, Whites are identified more often than either Hispanic or African Americans.

We have a lot of work to do in making sure minorities are correctly identified and getting appropriate services and supports.

Earlier age of identification.

The median age of autism diagnosis is about 4.5 years. This is a big jump down from the 2002 data, which had a median of 5 years. That is a good thing.

This is worth a couple of comments. First, there is still room for improvement. Most of the children had development concerns noted in their records before age 2. The obvious question is whether these children could have been identified sooner. This was one comment stressed by the CDC in the conference call.

It is also worth noting that autism isn’t “obvious” or “easy” to identify autistics. 4.5 years old is the median age.

It is also worth noting that the big jump down in median age of identification is a very clear indicator that, yes, people are getting better at identifying and diagnosing autistics.

The range of age of identification is as low as 2 months (!) to as high as 106 months. The low end is pretty remarkable. I don’t think there are any tests qualified for such young children. At the high end, that is nearly 9 years old. Again, this goes to the idea that autism is not obvious.

One complaint that is always used in these discussions is “what, are you saying that no one noticed these kids?”. No. They likely had other diagnoses or that some concerns were noted about development for them.

Number of kids receiving special education services.

Table 3 of the report is quite interesting. They show for six states what fraction of identified autistic kids are getting special education, and under what primary label.

In Colorado, 76% of autistic students are in special education, while in Arizona it is 96%. Is there really such a big difference in the needs of these kids from state to state?

Colorado has only 34% of the autistic students under the primary category of autism. Compare that to Maryland with 76%. Again, it is pretty clear that there is a lot of variation in how special education services are granted by state.

Cognitive Functioning

From the MMWR:

Data on cognitive functioning are reported for sites having IQ test scores available on at least 70% of children who met the ASD case definition. The proportion of children with ASDs who had test scores indicating cognitive impairment (IQ ?70) ranged from 29.3% in Colorado to 51.2% in South Carolina (average: 41%)

I find this information rather interesting. Most of the children with IQ data were not cognitively impaired.

2004 Prevalence data.

There was also a small appendix released today, with information on 2004 prevalence data (note that the study noted above is for 2006). Those data show a prevalence of 8 in 1,000, or 1 in 125. This is a “smaller scale effort”

It is interesting to put the data from the various studies into a timeline:

2000 originally 1 in 166, revised to 1 in 150 (6.7 per 1,000) (1992 cohort)
2002 1 in 152 (6.6 per 1,000) (1994 cohort)
2004 1 in 125 (8.0 per 1,000) (1996 cohort)
2006 1 in 110 (9.0 per 1,000) (1998 cohort)

If you recall, David Kirby claimed the new CDC data would support his hypothesis that the Hepatitis B vaccine caused an upsurge. Mr. Kirby mistakenly assumed that the 1% figure would be for the 1996 birth cohort. Mr Kirby then correlated the jump from 1 in 150 to 1 in 100 with the uptake of HepB vaccination in that birth cohort. He stated (incorrectly, we now know):

But according to the CDC’s National Immunization Survey (which also includes parental telephone interviews), only 8% of infant children received the Hep B vaccine in 1992, when that birth cohort showed an ASD rate of 67-per-10,000.

By 1994, the number of children receiving Hep B vaccine had reached just 27% — and the cohort showed a similar ASD rate.

But the Hep B coverage rate had risen to 82% by 1996, when that cohort’s ASD rate rose to around 100-per-10,000.

So, there was a smaller jump that correlates with the uptake in HepB in the 1994 cohort–the rate increased from 0.66% (1994) to 0.80% (1996). Then, two years later, there is a similar jump, from 0.80% (1996) to 0.90%. But, this time without the big increase in HepB vaccination.

Not so dramatic a story with the real data. Just a constant rise.

Final words

I hope this highlights some of the information in the study. I wish I had the time to spend to make this summary a bit easier of a read. But, there are other posts to write. Like one talking about Autism Speaks and the way they are capitalizing on the new prevalence numbers with a very deceptive graph.

CDC conference call: 1% autism prevalence.

18 Dec

The CDC conference call was today. This call was about the new MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports) that is due out. (The report is here, with an appendix here).

Dr. Catherine Rice, lead author was there. She gave the intro.

Report is released today. “Significant public health issue”. We need a coordinated and strong response to improve the lives of people with ASD.

2006–identified prevalence to be about 1% of 8 year olds. Representing about 8% of 8 year olds. 4.2 to 12.1 per 1000, average of 9.0 per 1000 (1 in 80 to 1 in 240, average on in 110)

The ADDM network collects data from multiple sites. All showed increases in identified ASD prevalence. The increases ranged from 27% to 95%, with an average of 57%

Identified ASD prevalence increased across all categories. Increases 55% for White, 90% for Hispanic (missed African American)

The autism prevalence is 4-5 times higher for boys. Prevalence numbers are 1 in 70 boys, 1 in 315 girls (average). The increases were 60% for boys, 48% for girls.

There were between 13-35% of the children studied who had a report of regression or loss of skills by age 2.

For most children, concerns were noted in the records were noted before age 2, but average identification age is about 4.5 years of age.

No single factor explains increase. Better detection is a factor (girls, Hispanics, people without cognitive impairment were given as examples of improved detection). True increase can not be ruled out.

CDC has new studies (such as SEED) to look into causes of autism. CDC is also represented on the IACC.

Some of the increase is due to better record keeping. One question from WebMD was about a possible true increase. CDC responded about the various factors involved, but a true increase can not be ruled out.

Boston Globe: (1) why are there broad “incidence” rates across sites (2) what about this study in terms of vaccinations.

Rage is 4.2 to 12.1 per 1,000. 7 sites were much more closely grouped around 10 per 1,000 (1%). There is a variation in the types of records available. The CDC representative states the low numbers are likely a low estimate.

Since autism is a behaviorally diagnosed condition, there will be variation in prevalence by region.

This study is not designed to look at risk factors, including vaccine. The children in this study were born in 1998, so these children were vaccinated with thimerosal.

NY Times: Range of spectrum. How well does this study catch the more “mild” end of the spectrum like PDD-NOS and Aspergers.

This went by fast, but it sounded like the CDC said that autism and PDD-NOS were more represented than Asperger syndrome.

CDC: The researchers do not actually test the children, but work on a review of existing records.

Pediatric news: What is the take home message for pediatricians?

CDC: Since there was usually an indication of delay before the age of 2, but identification wasn’t made until (on average) 4.5, pediatricians should be proactive in referring children for further evaluation.

In response to one question on intellectual disability: there is an overlap between autism and intellectual disability. Old stats showed 75% of autistics had Intellectual disability. Now it is more like 41%. This points to the idea that either the nature of autism is changing or that identification methods are changing, catching more autistics without intellectual disability.

CNN question–how much did the average age of diagnosis change?

CDC: 5 months. Children were identified on average 5 months sooner in these data than in the previous study.

Note: I made significant updates to this post since it was first published.

Is CDC to announce 1 in 100 autism rate?

18 Dec

And, if so, is SafeMinds trying to play games with Google news to get their story on top?

What happens when you are the first to break a big news story, at least in terms of Google News? Well, quite often your story gets to be the top story.

On Wednesday, SafeMinds put a piece on the Age of Autism Blog CDC Study Expected to Announce 1 in 100 Autism Rate—A Startling 50% Jump in Just Two Years. Evidence Points to an Environmental Trigger. Then, on Thursday, basically the same piece reappeared as CDC Brings Bad Tidings: 40,000 Children Diagnosed With Autism In This Year Alone. They open with:

Atlanta, GA – A study to be released Friday by the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is expected to report that autism prevalence has reached the epidemic rate of 1 in 100 children.

Usually when a new study comes out, journals or the CDC will release some information to the press on the condition that they respect the “embargo”. That is, everyone is supposed to wait until the same time before going public with the information.

There are advantages to not playing by the rules. When you get your story out first, especially on a big story, you can try to influence other stories and you can ride the top of the wave of press coverage.

Take a look at Google News for a big story and often there is a “lead” or top story. No one wants to be burried in the mass of stories. Get your story out first, and, hey, maybe you will be the top story.

That would be a big public relations coup for SafeMinds. At the same time, we have to ask: if SafeMinds is correct, are they breaking an embargo? The release of information about a recent Pediatrics study claiming a 1% autism prevalence caused some bad press for the autism community (also here and here).

Let’s watch. Will SafeMinds put out yet another post Friday morning, just in case? Will they succeed in getting a prominent spot for their pieces? Will journalists covering the story contact SafeMinds or use their material for stories?

The CDC autism prevalence estimates are made via MMWR’s (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports). The previous report was from 2007, using data collected in 2002, with the 1 in 150 prevalence estimate that has been commonly quoted.

If you recall, the existence of the upcoming MMWR was leaked a few months ago. Lee Grossman, president of the Autism Society of America, somehow found out and talked publicly, and David Kirby blogged it. Of course, Mr. Kirby found a way (or was told a way) to include this as evidence of vaccines causing autism. The argument being that the Hepatitis B vaccine was given to those kids. It didn’t matter that the other dataset he was discussing in that same post, from the National Children’s Health Survey, didn’t support the idea at all. SafeMinds seems to be making the same arguments in their blog pieces as well.

If SafeMinds is correct and the announcement comes out Friday, expect updates on the CDC autism data page, and the CDC autism page. But, hey, expect about 5,000 news articles too.

Autistic Self Advocacy Network leader Ari Ne’eman has been nominated by President Barack Obama for a position on the National Council on Disability

17 Dec

From a White House press release yesterday:

President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts, 12/16/09

* Marie Collins Johns, Deputy Administrator, Small Business Administration
* Gwendolyn E. Boyd, Member, Board of Trustees of the Barry Goldwater Scholarship and Excellence in Education Foundation
* Jonathan M. Young, Chair, National Council on Disability
* Carol Jean Reynolds, Member, National Council on Disability
* Fernando Torres-Gil, Member, National Council on Disability
* Chester Alonzo Finn, Member, National Council on Disability
* Gary Blumenthal, Member, National Council on Disability
* Sara Gelser, Member, National Council on Disability
* Ari Ne’eman, Member, National Council on Disability
* Dongwoo Joseph “Joe” Pak, Member, National Council on Disability

President Obama said, “I am grateful that these fine individuals have chosen to serve in my administration. They will bring a depth of experience and valued perspective to their roles, and I look forward to working with them in the months and years ahead.”

edit to add, from the press release:

Ari Ne’eman, Nominee for Member, National Council on Disability
Ari Ne’eman is the Founding President of the Autistic Self-Advocacy Network, where he initiates and directs efforts to increase the representation of autistic individuals in public policy discussions. He is a leading advocate in the neurodiversity movement, frequently briefing policymakers and speaking publicly on disability and autism policy issues. Mr. Ne’eman also serves as Vice Chair of the New Jersey Adults with Autism Task Force, where he represents autistic adults in reviewing the state’s autism services. He also previously served on the New Jersey’s Special Education Review Commission, where he authored a minority report on the topic of aversives, restraint and seclusion. Mr. Ne’eman previously served as the Policy Workgroup Leader for the Youth Advisory Council to the National Council on Disability. He is a board member of TASH and the Autism National Committee. In 2008, he received the HSC Foundation “Advocates in Disability” Award. Mr. Ne’eman is currently an undergraduate at the University of Maryland-Baltimore County where he studies political science and expects to graduate in May 2010. In 2000, Mr. Ne’eman was diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome, an autism spectrum disorder.

An example of how people earn the title “denialist”

16 Dec

Denialist. One who denies. It is a phrase that gets thrown around a lot on the internet. You don’t agree with me? Well, you must be a denialist. The term has risen in prominence lately with Michael Specter’s recent book, “Denialism, How Irrational Thinking Hinders Scientific Progress, Harms the Planet, and Threatens Our Lives” One of his prime examples is the anti-vaccine movement, so this book has been discussed on a number of autism blogs (including this one).

Denial–here are definitions from dictionary.com

1. an assertion that something said, believed, alleged, etc., is false: Despite his denials, we knew he had taken the purse. The politician issued a denial of his opponent’s charges.
2. refusal to believe a doctrine, theory, or the like.
3. disbelief in the existence or reality of a thing.
4. the refusal to satisfy a claim, request, desire, etc., or the refusal of a person making it.
5. refusal to recognize or acknowledge; a disowning or disavowal: the traitor’s denial of his country; Peter’s denial of Christ.
6. Law. refusal to acknowledge the validity of a claim, suit, or the like; a plea that denies allegations of fact in an adversary’s plea: Although she sued for libel, he entered a general denial.
7. sacrifice of one’s own wants or needs; self-denial.
8. Psychology. an unconscious defense mechanism used to reduce anxiety by denying thoughts, feelings, or facts that are consciously intolerable.

Many people “deny” that vaccines work. Many people “deny” that the diseases vaccines prevent are dangerous. People who do so are, in my book, denialists.

Case in point, a recent blog post by Kim Stagliano of the Age of Autism blog: An Autism Mom Goes Back to Christmas 1962. In it, she presents a doll from 1962. A doll with a changeable face, and one face shows the baby doll with measles. The message of the blog post is clear: measles wasn’t so bad. Ms. Stagliano writes:

Yes, in 1962, measles were a common childhood illness. And little girls played with dollies that had the measles, and made them all better. So did doctors for children who got the measles.

Well, yes. Most of the time children got better.

Let’s check what people wrote about measles in the early 1960’s, shall we? From Time Magazine, 1961 (with emphasis added by me).

When famed Harvard Nobel Laureate John Franklin Enders announced at a Manhattan meeting three years ago that he had isolated measles virus, his fellow virologists stood up and cheered. It would not be long, they hoped, before a vaccine could be developed to wipe out a disease that sends one child in 4,000 to institutions for the feebleminded. But the first live virus vaccine developed by Enders left much to be desired; four of five children got severe fevers, roughly half developed a rash. Last week, after much toil by Enders and others, a group of Pennsylvania physicians and virologists announced that they had successfully tested a measles vaccination technique. Children are first inoculated with Enders vaccine, which gives nearly 100% protection. Then, almost immediately, they are injected in the same arm with gamma globulin, which holds undesirable side effects, such as fever and rash, to a minimum. The Public Health Service still must approve the new measles technique, establish manufacturing standards. If all goes well, a vaccine will be on the market next year, just as measles heads toward its next cyclical peak.

Yes, virologists cheered, 1 in 4,000 children were sent to institutions.

Life Magazine, in 1963, discussed the new vaccines for Measles.

Though often joked about, this commonplace disease kills about 400 Americans each year–twice the number that polio now kills. Several thousand cases each year develop encephalitis, which can damage the brain.

The Age of Autism, where Ms. Stagliano blogs, was quite upset by Mr. Specter and his book for singling out anti-vaccine groups as denialists. My suggestion: if you don’t want to be labeled denialist, don’t be a denialist.

Gertrude “Trudy” Steuernagel in her own words.

15 Dec

Gertrude “Trudy” Steuernagel was the mother of Sky Walker. In case the story is unknown to you, it is one of tragedy. It appears that Sky Walker beat his mother, killing her. Sky Walker is autistic and quite disabled. He is also aggressive and quite strong.

He also loves his mother, and his mother loved him very deeply.

It is an important story within the autism community. One which is difficult for me to write about. This is especially so since many people seem to want to speak for Prof. Steuernage and/or her son and I don’t know how to write this without doing the same. So, with apologies to the Kent State newspaper, from where I lifted these articles in their entirety, I would like to present her own words. Should the request, will pull this post.

Here is a letter she sent to the Kent State newspaper about her son, Sky and his perseverations:

My son’s trail of sparkles

My son was diagnosed with autism shortly before his third birthday. I wasn’t surprised and had suspected autism. That said, I was unprepared for the depth and breadth of the challenges autism would present to us. Sky has classical autism and is on the severe end of the spectrum.

His verbal abilities are limited. I have never had a conversation with my son. He does not ride a bike. He does not tie his shoes. I say “does not” because with autism it is impossible to tell if it is “cannot” or “will not” or some combination. He will never drive a car or live independently. He will never be a husband or a father. The first questions I asked when I heard his diagnosis were “will he learn to read?” and “will he get married?” In that order. Autism helps you clarify what matters to you.

Sky had difficulties in preschool with scissors. He did not have the fine motor coordination or motor planning skills he needed to cut construction paper pumpkins. I worked with him with limited success and eventually, as I always do, arrived at my safe place, my “what difference does it make” place. The world, I decided, could make do with one less construction paper pumpkin. I forgot about scissors and the challenges they posed for Sky.

Two years later I went to his first kindergarten parent teacher conference and heard “Sky is quite good at cutting but has some difficulties with complex patterns.” Somehow, he had made it past learning how to place the scissors on his fingers, past how to coordinate paper in one hand in scissors in the other, past the conundrum of whether to cut inside or outside the line on the paper. Sky could, in teacher speak, “scissor.” Life went on and I thought no more of scissors.

Today Sky is 16 and, in addition to autism, he now carries the diagnosis of obsessive compulsive disorder. He can read and he is not married. Sky has many rituals, one of which is cutting paper into tiny pieces. He particularly likes to cut cellophane fruit bar wrappers into confetti sized pieces. The fruit bar must be strawberry. My nightly ritual is to get down on my hands and knees and pick the sticky confetti off the hardwood floors in the kitchen and family room. I always miss pieces and these are tracked on the soles of our feet or shoes throughout the house.

One night I was frustrated and angry with the universe. Why, I thought, does he do this? He doesn’t even eat the fruit bar. Then I thought back to the preschool days, the days when Sky did not “scissor.” I started to smile. The smile turned into a laugh, the laugh into a guffaw. My son the cutup had once again proven to be my best teacher. Try your best; do what you can; the universe will come to you.

I still don’t enjoy picking minuscule pieces of sticky cellophane from the kitchen floor, but the pieces that get tracked through the house? I try to appreciate the sparkle they bring to aged carpet, the pattern they make on worn tiles. I see those sticky cellophane bits as a trail my son leaves for me as we navigate this strange world of autism, because we do navigate it together and always will. Sometimes I lead and sometimes Sky leads and sometimes we get it right. Like we did this time. Sky can use scissors and use them well. He mastered that skill and he will master others.

Neither Sky nor I will ever win the Nobel Peace Prize. Neither of us will write the great American novel. We will, however, make each other laugh. We’ll challenge each other to be better people, to be a better mother and a better son. He is my dance partner and I his. Sometimes we step on each other’s toes and sometimes we navigate with great grace. I’ve learned when to lead and when to follow. I know Sky will continue to leave a trail for me, a trail of sparkles.

Here is an article she wrote about how Kent State’s hiring practices discriminated against the disabled.

Dear editor,

Stephen Hawking is not qualified to be hired as the Dean of our Honors College.

Why? According to the requirements listed for the position, advertised on the university’s Web site, the physical requirements for the position are as follows:

“Light work-exerting up to 20 pounds of force occasionally, and/or up to 10 pounds of force frequently, and/or negligible amount of force constantly to move objects. Typically requires sitting, walking, standing, bending, keying, talking, hearing, seeing and repetitive motions.”

Hawking, the eminent physicist, has ALS, more commonly referred to as Lou Gehrigs disease, and is confined to a wheelchair with little if any control of his motor functions. He uses an artificial synthesizer to speak. He cannot sit, walk, stand, bend, key, or talk without assistance. With Hawking, however, the deficits are minimal compared to what he would bring to the job including, but not limited to, his incredible intellect and his international stature.

Truthfully, I don’t believe Hawking has any interest in becoming dean of our Honors College. Our loss. What I do believe, however, is that the physical requirements listed for this position are reflective of a cultural bias against individuals with disabilities.

We look at what is missing, not at what an individual with challenges might bring to a position. We are all challenged in some way.

Isn’t it time we stop thinking that a person who cannot walk cannot be a dean? That a person who cannot “key” cannot lead our Honors College? Ironically, my son, whose autism guarantees he does more than enough repetitive motions to qualify him for this aspect of the position, would not receive adequate health coverage because KSU contains to retain the autism waiver in its health plan. Darned if you do; darned if you don’t.

Trudy Steuernagel
Political science professor

Another about what a conversation with her son would be like.

Just a conversation
3/28/2008

What I wouldn’t give for a conversation with my son. I don’t mean “the” conversation as in the birds and bees talk, but a conversation. My son has autism and he and I have never had a conversation. I keep waiting for that day. In the early days, right after his diagnosis, I was sure it would happen. Now, as Sky has celebrated his 17th birthday, I’m not so sure that will happen. So now I plan, just in case.

I think about what might be said in that conversation. What would I want to know first? I want to know if he is happy. Then I want to know what I could do to help him. When he gets so frustrated he strikes out, is there anything I could do? Anything I could say? I’m curious, so I would ask a lot of these kinds of questions. Why do you like “The Price is Right” so much? What is it you like about Dr. Seuss? How did you discover YouTube? Why will you wear only blue shirts? Why do you shred paper? Why do you watch the ABC “Nightly News” and never CBS or NBC? Why do you like Bill Clinton so much? I’d like to know if he thinks I’m funny.

I hope he has some questions for me. I think he’d ask why I don’t make homemade fettucini alfredo more often than I do. I think he would ask why he only goes to Disney World once or twice a year, and why we can’t live in Small World. I know he doesn’t need to ask if I love him. When we’ve had a bad day, Sky says “swap me.” I say, “I’ll never swap you. I’m going to keep you forever and ever.” He says “swap me” again and again and each time I reply with my forever commitment. It soothes and reassures both of us.

Life with Sky these past few years has been very isolating for the two of us. We can’t go out and do the things we used to like to do because Sky gets so overwhelmed. Much of our time, we’re here in the house. Sky has taught me to be in the moment. All children do that for their parents, but it is particularly true for Sky. Four years ago, things were so bad Sky could not even attend school for an entire day. My life was dominated by trying to teach my classes, trying to run a household, trying to fit everything into the few hours he was at school. On bad days, those few hours could turn into a few minutes. I had to take him and pick him up because the bus was no longer an option. I couldn’t be a friend to anyone because I physically and emotionally could not be there for them. I had no patience with good and decent colleagues who told me how busy they were. Busy? Try spending an evening sitting in a closet with your back to the door trying to hold it shut while your child kicks it in. I had even less patience with good and decent students who were “stressed” because they had a paper due. But Sky, as he always does, showed me the way. Even on the worst of days, Sky would find something to enjoy, even if it lasted less than 30 seconds. Maybe it was his beloved vanilla ice cream; maybe it was a chance to see 10 minutes of “Press Your Luck.” So I started to look for my joy. Every morning while I help Sky to get ready, I put his shoes on his feet. Then, following the ritual, I lie back on his bed while he puts his feet into his shoes. Then he sits down and puts his feet out for me to tie his shoes. I realized I had approximately 17 seconds where I could lie back and not have to do anything, fear anything, clean anything, teach anything. Seventeen seconds it took for Sky to jam his feet into his shoes, sit back on the chair and put his legs on my lap. Some days, those were the only blissful 17 seconds in my day, but they sustained me.

Today, things aren’t great, but they are better. My joy is not compressed into those 17 seconds and can extend throughout an entire day. We are still isolated, however. Odd how so many parties that used to include invitations for families are now “adults only.” As friends’ children get married, children I’ve known their entire lives, I get asked to fewer and fewer weddings. Friendships not nurtured die off, I tell myself, not wanting to believe Sky and I are just unwanted. Oddly, and for better or worse, we’re content; but I still want a conversation.

Here is a letter she wrote, pushing Kent State to give domestic partner benefits to employees. It isn’t about autism. but I appreciated the sentiment.


Domestic partner benefits strength of new contract

Dear editor:

I support the Kent State administration’s offer to extend the faculty contract one year. This offer includes the pledge not to raise health care premiums (no small matter these days) and, most importantly, to implement domestic partner benefits. The struggle for domestic partner benefits on this campus has been long and fraught with charges and countercharges of misleading statements and outright lying. AAUP’s recommendation not to accept the one year extension of the contract which would finally bring justice to gay and lesbian faculty, their spouses and their children is shortsighted. Domestic partner benefits are a vital tool in the recruitment and retention of quality faculty. How can we be certain domestic partner benefits will be obtained under a new contract? We cannot, and history suggests they will not be. Indeed, the administration might well see the AAUP as marginalizing domestic partner benefits or at the very least indicating a willingness to trade them away for something else, particularly higher salaries. The latter raises another issue I have with AAUP. In the past I, like other faculty, have received numerous charts indicating how our salaries would be much lower if it were not for AAUP. Now we are being presented salary charts saying our salaries could not fall much lower. I simply do not understand this. What I do understand is that accepting the contract extension will in all likelihood not help me. My guess is this means there will not be a faculty buyout and the autism exclusion clause in the current contract will continue. Still, I support the extension based on my belief that the single most important issue before us is making certain domestic partner benefits are guaranteed.

Her nephew put together a slide show which I think is worth watching. It is mostly (about 3/4) about her before Sky, but has a number of photos of her with Sky.

In writing this piece I am in no way saying Prof. Steuernagel would have agreed with any or all the positions taken on this blog. But, if I could I would share one of my favorite posts with her, one about trucks.

Finally, here is a letter that she wrote. This letter was found in her personal affects after her death.

“To whom it may concern:

“If this letter has been opened and is being read, it is because I have been seriously injured or killed by my son, Sky Walker. I love Sky with my whole heart and soul and do not believe he has intentionally injured me. I have tried my best to get help for him and to end the pattern of violence that has developed in this home. I believe my best has not been good enough. That is my fault, not Sky’s. Numerous people know about the violence and many have witnessed it. We have all failed Sky. I do not want him to be punished for actions for which he is not responsible.

“Trudy Steuernagel.”

This letter, or more specifically the stories about this letter, are what prompted me to finally write about this story. In the introduction to the article linked above, they only quote the first line:

“If this letter has been opened and is being read, it is because I have been seriously injured or killed by my son, Sky Walker.”

They save the entire letter for the end of the story. I have read about this letter in other places where they only gave the first line of the letter. To me, cutting out that one line is being used to tell a very different story than what I believe Prof. Steuernagel intended with her letter. I’ll let you decide for yourself.

I wish Sky Walker and his extended family well through these very tough times. I wish Sky Walker peace.

Autism Research at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Is Among Time Magazine’s Top 10 Medical Breakthroughs

11 Dec

I just saw this press release and thought it worth noting here. I saw the story at Time Magazine yesterday, but I already had a few posts going up them. I find it good that autism research is high enough profile to make the Time list.

PHILADELPHIA, Dec. 11 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Autism research led by scientists at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia has been named one of the top ten medical breakthroughs of 2009 by Time Magazine.

On the magazine’s website on Dec. 8, Time cited the largest-ever genetic study of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), published in April in the journal Nature, by a group led by Hakon Hakonarson, M.D., Ph.D., director of the Center for Applied Genomics at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. That study identified DNA variations that account for as many as 15 percent of all ASD cases. Because the gene region affects how brain cells connect with each other in early childhood, the research significantly advances the understanding of how autism originates.

“We are proud of this research discovery, and are glad to see it receive this recognition,” said Philip R. Johnson, M.D., chief scientific officer at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. “It provides a starting point for translating biological knowledge into future autism treatments.”

The autism gene research from Children’s Hospital, which included two studies in the same issue of Nature, received extensive news coverage, including the CBS Evening News, ABC World News Tonight, BBC, Reuters, the Chicago Tribune, the Philadelphia Inquirer, and other news outlets in the U.K., India, Australia, Germany and China. Hakonarson’s main collaborator was neuroscientist Gerard D. Schellenberg, Ph.D., of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, with other scientists participating from 14 additional centers.

To see Time’s description of new research on autism, click here:

http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1945379_1944376_1944404,00.html

About the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia: The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia was founded in 1855 as the nation’s first pediatric hospital. Through its long-standing commitment to providing exceptional patient care, training new generations of pediatric healthcare professionals and pioneering major research initiatives, Children’s Hospital has fostered many discoveries that have benefited children worldwide. Its pediatric research program is among the largest in the country, ranking third in National Institutes of Health funding. In addition, its unique family-centered care and public service programs have brought the 441-bed hospital recognition as a leading advocate for children and adolescents. For more information, visit http://www.chop.edu.

CONTACT: Rachel Salis-Silverman of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, +1-267-426-6063, Salis@email.chop.edu

SOURCE The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia

People Affected by Autism Believe Increase Is ‘Real,’ Not Diagnostic

11 Dec

At least, that is what Science Daily has to say about a new study out of Exeter and Bristol. And with a title like that, you have to imagine people will jump on it and claim that the title says that the increase is real (read it again, it doesn’t say that at all).

From Science Daily:

“There is no doubt that the reported prevalence of autistic spectrum disorders has increased spectacularly over the last 20 years,” said Ms Russell. “Medical consensus is that the increase is not a ‘real’ increase in cases but is the result of the diagnosis being made more often.

“But our examination of letters and phone calls received by scientists carrying out research into the environmental causes of autism shows that, in the opinion of many people in contact with autistic children, it is not diagnosis but true incidence which has increased, and these people think that we should be investigating what factors have led to this increase. They believe that it goes hand in hand with lifestyle changes in the late 20th and early 21st century, changes which are causing autistic spectrum disorders to occur more often.”

Let’s take a look at the abstract from the actual study, shall we?

A qualitative analysis of lay beliefs about the aetiology and prevalence of autistic spectrum disorders

ABSTRACT

Introduction There has been a dramatic increase in the prevalence of autistic spectrum disorders (ASD) in the last 20 years. The reasons for this are disputed. The consensus among epidemiologists and other experts is that greater case load is due to changes in diagnostic practice rather than reflecting changing aetiological factors leading to a true increase in incidence. We set out to examine lay views concerning the aetiology and prevalence of ASD and whether they conflict with or support this consensus position.

Methods Over 100 unsolicited communications (letters e mails and several telephone calls) were received by a UK epidemiological study of ASD. We carried out a qualitative analysis of all correspondence in order to examine spontaneously expressed lay beliefs about the prevalence and aetiology of ASD.

Results The majority of correspondents suggested theories about environmental causes of ASD. This study demonstrates the strength of lay belief that the true incidence of autism is rising, and this is due to risks from modern technologies and changing lifestyles.

Conclusion This study based on unsolicited data highlights the contrast between lay explanations of increasing prevalence and the consensus opinion of medical experts. It also demonstrates how many people in direct contact with ASD have important information to share.

Yes, they read emails and letters and logged phone calls and came to the conclusion that many people in contact with autistics think that the increase is real.

I am stunned this got published. Maybe I am too close to the subject, but the idea that many non-researchers in the autism communities think the increase is real is, well, far from surprising.

For now, let’s just acknoweldge what is said and what is not said in the paper. They say that non-researchers believe the increase is real. They do not say the increase is real.

Obama, nearly one year after inauguration

11 Dec

A year ago I spent a lot of time blogging about Barack Obama. As the U.S. election neared, I liked what I heard from him–concrete statements, not just pseudo-promises with no teeth like Mr. McCain was giving us here in the U.S..

After the inauguration, I blogged Change and Hope, taking two of the catch-words from the campaign.

Stimulus money was applied to autism research. Tom Insel (head of NIMH and chair of the IACC) gave credit to the fact that they had a Strategic Plan in place. It is easier to justify spending money when you can tell someone (the president in this case) exactly what you intend to do. Dr. Insel noted that in a recent meeting, Mr. Obama restated his commitment to allocate $1B towards autism research.

The Whitehouse’s web site includes a page on disability policy. A few of the steps Mr. Obama has taken include appointing a special adviser on disability policy and applying over $12B in stimulus money towards IDEA (special education funding–the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act).

What we haven’t seen yet is the appointment of an “Autism Czar”, or an increase in IDEA funding to full levels. Also, the IDEA funding from the stimulus money is not a long term commitment.

This has been a very tough year for Mr. Obama. He came in to office with a major economic crisis and (or compounded by!) two wars ongoing. Those are huge distractions for anyone, but I would like to see focus applied especially on long-term, full funding of IDEA.

I am curious as to what other people think of promises made during the election and where we stand now.

Search and Rescue and autistics

10 Dec

It is an unfortunate fact that we see a lot of lost kid stories in the autism community. Elopement–running away–is real and serious.

I’m always caught in what to do when these stories come up in the media. The stories affect me greatly as this is one of the big fears of an autism parent. It affects me even more when I think of the fear for the lost autistic. I remember being lost. I remember the terror. Most of the stories area about kids, and I know I was a much more capable kid than many of the autistics mentioned in those news stories. I can only imagine how terrifying it must be for the lost autistic. I feel like anything I write could trivialize their experiences.

I think I have to get over that. When I talk to the search and rescue people, they tell me it is valuable to raise awareness.

Of course, I’m prompted to write this after the recent, tragic story about James Delorey, an autistic child who was lost in the cold of Cape Breton, Canada for two nights. He was found, but still died of hypothermia.

I wanted to write about search and rescue, from the perspective of a parent of an autistic. But, this isn’t something I am really well read about. So, thankfully Alex Bain over at the RunMan blog have an excellent post on this as a part of their condolences to the family on Master Delorey’s passing. I am borrowing their YouTube content, but do take the time to read the post (and bookmark the blog–it is excellent!)

They were interviewed about search and rescue by CBC TV Compass News Interview and CBC Radio Island Morning interview.

Here is the video from the TV interview

Here is audio from the radio interview with Alex’s mother, Janet Norman Bain:

One piece of advice that Alex has given on his blog in the past, and in this post, is the use of an ID tag or bracelet. Here is an image of his bracelet:

roadid

I have one of these, as does everyone in my family. You can put these on shoes, cliping them to laces/straps. That’s where we put them since (a) I am forgetful and will leave it off much of the time and (b) my kid doesn’t like bracelets.

Alex gives more information about ID bracelets in another post on his blog.

As I said, and you have likely noticed, I don’t tend to write about these stories. Keeping stories like this in the news is important. It lets the rescue workers–and the people paying them–know they are valued.

Letting people know they are valued is important in general, in my opinion. I tend to contact (email or phone) people who do cool things–like researchers and, well, rescue workers. I’m not saying we need big phone-in campaigns for rescue workers, but if the inspiration strikes, don’t feel shy about dropping an email or commenting on a news story thanking them.

If I had a lost typical kid, I’d probably defer to the search and rescue team’s expertise. By that I mean that I would let them ask the questions about my child and trust that their experience and expertise would guide them to the correct questions (again, for the most part! I’d still have things to offer in addition to their questions)

However, with a disabled child, I keep thinking ahead as to what I would want to tell the Search and Rescue team. Really, I think that I’d need to educate the Search and Rescue team about how my kid is likely very different from any they’ve helped before.

First bit of advice–call the police sooner rather than later. The police won’t mind a second phone call with a message of “you don’t have to send a car, we found the kid”.

The sorts of things to tell the search and rescue team that I’ve thought of and heard from other parents (and let me know if you have others or find these wrong for any reason)

1) What is the person’s “cognitive” age. If they are looking for a 10 year old, they have certain expectations. If you tell them, “this kid cognitively is more like a 4 year old” that resets a lot of expectations.

You may have to tell this this repeatedly.

2) Can the person talk? They are expecting someone verbal.

3) if the person can talk, will he she respond to someone calling out their name? That can change the search methods dramatically.

4) What is the person wearing? One search and rescue person I talked to gave the example of a case where the team didn’t ask the parents this. They assumed that since the kid was about 10, he had dressed himself and that the parents probably didn’t recall what the kid was wearing. If you are dressing your kid still at that age, you may have a better idea what the kid is wearing.

5) Does the person have a restricted diet. If they find a lost kid and offer gatorade or some other rehydration drink, the person may reject it. Strongly. The person may reject other foods and/or drinks. They should be prepared for this.

6) Does the person have dietary restrictions. Whatever you think of diets like GFCF, if a person is on a restricted diet, the rescue workers should know not to offer certain foods.

7) Does the person have a fear of medical workers? A person in a white lab coat may seem nice and comforting to some people, but could be terrorizing to another. If so, the teams should know.

8) Does the person still wear a diaper? They (a) should be prepared with new ones and (b) may want to be on the lookout for a discarded diaper in their search. Some kids can take the diapers off, but can’t put pants/shoes back on. This would mean (a) look out for the clothes and (b) be prepared for the kid to show even more signs of exposure.

9) Is the person on any medications? What is the person like without the medication or on withdrawal from the medication?

10) Does the person have very special interests? This may be a good thing to coax a person out of hiding, and to calm the person after being found. Also, the rescue workers should know that they may have to discuss a single subject over and over until you show up.

11) Just because a person doesn’t talk doesn’t mean that he/she isn’t aware of what is going on.

12) What is calming to the person? Music may calm one person and irritate another. Some people might be sensory seekers, other sensory avoiders. The rescue workers should know for when they find the person.

These are just some of the suggestions I’ve heard from parents. Every person will be different and I know that search and rescue teams are aware of this. But, some people are very different from most of their experiences. Disabled kids, for example. Autistics. Be prepared to educate the search and rescue team about specific details about your loved one.

This is not my area of expertise by far. If you see anything that you think should be changed, don’t be shy. Let me know. I have tried to make this age-neutral, but as a parent I am biased towards talking about children and that probably shows.

Rescue workers are heroes. I think we all hurt a little when someone goes missing and we all cheer a little when someone is found, even if that person is thousands of miles away.